Looking at the Ubuntu/Launchpad bug list for Lilypond makes me wonder -- is
there any mechanism in place to ensure Lilypond developers receive bug reports
placed in distros' bugtrackers?
If not, perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fed
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
> distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the development team at least
> gets alerted to the issues out there?
sounds like +1
Janek
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:45:30PM +0200, Janek Warcho wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> wrote:
> > perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
> > distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the development team at least
> > gets aler
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> wrote:
> > perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
> > distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the development team at least
> > gets alerted to t
On 10/02/2012 11:51 PM, Colin Hall wrote:
bugs-lilypond is for receiving reports against the code we release.
Can you suggest a viable alternative to ensure that the development team receive
notice of downstream bug reports?
___
bug-lilypond maili
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:18:34PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Looking at the Ubuntu/Launchpad bug list for Lilypond makes me
> wonder -- is there any mechanism in place to ensure Lilypond
> developers receive bug reports placed in distros' bugtrackers?
No.
> If not, perhaps it's wort
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Graham Percival wrote:
If not, perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for
the major distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the
development team at least gets alerted to the issues out there?
Those distros can come talk to us if they want to send
Martin Tarenskeen writes:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Graham Percival wrote:
>
>>> If not, perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for
>>> the major distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the
>>> development team at least gets alerted to the issues out there?
>>
>> Those distro
On 10/03/2012 06:04 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
Those distros can come talk to us if they want to send good bug
reports to the proper place.
I don't understand why you'd take that attitude. It's trivial to listen in on
bug reports from a few key distros, the total volume is unlikely to be a
p
Hello Joseph,
2012/10/3 Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> I don't understand why you'd take that attitude. It's trivial to listen
> in on bug reports from a few key distros, the total volume is unlikely to
> be a problem, and it improves the chances that users' and distros' problems
> with the software
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:47:41PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 06:04 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> >Those distros can come talk to us if they want to send good bug
> >reports to the proper place.
>
> I don't understand why you'd take that attitude. It's trivial to
> liste
On 10/03/2012 07:17 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
Is it really trivial? I can not imagine, how would you do it. A bug squad member
is supposed to spend 20 minutes a weak with his duties (bug reports,
verifying...). Maybe it seems to you to be to little, but even though there is
not enough people willing
On 10/03/2012 07:49 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
I don't understand why you'd take that attitude. It's trivial for
distribution package maintainers to send good bug reports
upstream, the total volume is unlikely to be a problem, and it
improves the chances that users' and distros' problems with th
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:53:40PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> OTOH if bug-lilypond is signed up to receive reports from a few key
> distros, you get those notices automatically without anyone having
> to put in any extra effort.
We are not going to sign up bug-lilypond to receive noti
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:53:40PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> OTOH if bug-lilypond is signed up to receive reports from a few key
>> distros, you get those notices automatically without anyone having
>> to put in any extra eff
On 10/03/2012 10:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
We are not going to sign up bug-lilypond to receive notices
automatically. Most reports will not be useful, and they will
screw up the automatic tools we use to keep track of whether
reports have been dealt with or not.
It doesn't have to be bug-l
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:56:37PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 10:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> >We are not going to sign up bug-lilypond to receive notices
> >automatically. Most reports will not be useful, and they will
> >screw up the automatic tools we use to keep t
On 10/04/2012 01:32 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
ok, so you won't mind volunteering to take care of this with your
personal email account.
Look, the whole point of what I was suggesting was this: that it would be useful
for the Lilypond team to be _automatically_ notified when a downstream bug g
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 07:17:05PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 01:32 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> >ok, so you won't mind volunteering to take care of this with your
> >personal email account.
>
> Look, the whole point of what I was suggesting was this: that it
> would be
On 10/05/2012 12:02 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
That's your opinion. My opinion is that it would *not* be useful
to receive automatic notifications, since most automatic
notifications from distro bugs are useless for us.
Fair enough.
I'm sorry if my earlier emails came across as dismissive of
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 11:31:42PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 12:02 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> >That's your opinion. My opinion is that it would *not* be useful
> >to receive automatic notifications, since most automatic
> >notifications from distro bugs are useless fo
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:56:37PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> On 10/03/2012 10:36 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>> >We are not going to sign up bug-lilypond to receive notices
>> >automatically. Most reports will not be useful, and they will
>> >screw up the
22 matches
Mail list logo
