Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=517
Cheers,
- Graham
Hans Aberg wrote:
I don't think so:
In this new case, the triplets are treated as merely being time values
(2/3 notes), which do not need to fill up the whole triplet value. It is
thus possible to only
I don't think so:
In this new case, the triplets are treated as merely being time
values (2/3 notes), which do not need to fill up the whole triplet
value. It is thus possible to only have one 2/3 note standing alone,
completed by additional 2/3 notes in other positions. Then one expect
Graham Percival wrote:
Isn't this another case of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=405q=tuplet
No, since it's about printing the number, not the bracket.
There's a comment in lily/tuplet-number.cc about some rows of code that
remove the number object if it doesn't span
What you really are saying is that it's a bug that a single note triplet
isn't
marked as a triplet, i.e. that \times 2/3 {c8} is completely equivalent
to c8*2/3,
also when it comes to printing the number indicating the triplet.
Can you please refer to any printed music that uses such a
Isn't this another case of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=405q=tuplet
(although you haven't used #'brackt-visibility here, adding it doens't help)
Cheers,
- Graham
Hans Aberg wrote:
I report this problem just for completeness. If one breaks up a triple
into to two parts,
I report this problem just for completeness. If one breaks up a
triple into to two parts, as in the following example, the triplet
number on the single note does not show. The code is
{
\time 2/8
\times 2/3 { e16 f16 } g8 \times 2/3 { a16 } |
}
It looks as in the attached GIF. (There is a
