2010/5/30 Graham Percival :
> Did you try looking on the tracker?
>
> closed, submitted, etc.
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=836
>
> open item:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1041
Sorry, missed that.
That would have been easier than digging out and sea
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:59:57PM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> I recently answered a question about "output suffix"
Did you try looking on the tracker?
closed, submitted, etc.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=836
open item:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=
Special recipients: Marek Klein, Valentin.
Hi dear Frogs!
I recently answered a question about "output suffix"
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-05/msg00302.html
and I found out the discussion "Naming output files":
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l
2009/2/26 Reinhold Kainhofer
>
> It would actually be quite simple to implement: In scm/lily-library.scm in
> the
> print- book-with function, instead of storing the file count as a number in
> 'output-count, store it in an alist (which is set as the 'output-count
> parser
> variable), with the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009 10:58:19 Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> The obvious follow-up question is, why you get the additional number
> even when the file name would
> be unique without the number, i.e. when the output-suffix is set
> differently for e
Francisco Vila wrote:
... Is there a command I can add to a \book{}
block to specify the output file name, or the suffix to add to the base
name. E.g. to get files names such as:
song-C.pdf
song-Eb.pdf
etc.
The answer is in the manual, see Application Usage 3.2.1
http://lilypond.org/
