On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2013/11/30 Noeck :
> > Hi,
> >
> > is this a bug or is there some reason why this should be correct:
> >
> > If I use a percent repeat in a customly timed measure (5/4 instead of
> &g
Hi,
2013/11/30 Noeck :
> Hi,
>
> is this a bug or is there some reason why this should be correct:
>
> If I use a percent repeat in a customly timed measure (5/4 instead of
> 4/4), the repeat symbol lacks the dots and is placed to the left of the
> bar. If I write something
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Peter Crighton <
petecrigh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> % Empty staves are not removed after a percent repeat of one bar. Two or
> more
> bars work fine.
>
> \version "2.16.2"
>
> \paper { ragged-right = ##t }
>
% Empty staves are not removed after a percent repeat of one bar. Two or more
bars work fine.
\version "2.16.2"
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\RemoveEmptyStaves
}
}
\relative c' {
\repeat unfold 4 { c1 }
\break
R1*4
\break
\r
f error
>> messages
>> (the full piece of music showed similar inconvenient lack of line numbers
>> with the errors).
>
> A simple change prevents the errors:
>
> \version "2.14.2"
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> \relative c'' {
>
Comment #1 on issue 2439 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: tupletSpannerDuration
and percent repeat conflict
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2439
Moving the \times 2/3 *inside* the percent repeat solves the problem:
\version "2.14.2"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\
A simple change prevents the errors:
\version "2.14.2"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\relative c'' {
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
% \times 2/3 { % NOTE -- move the \times 2/3 *inside* the
repeat percent
\repea
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Lenore Horner
wrote:
> > I'm not top posting.
>
> \version "2.14.2"
> \paper{ ragged-right=##t }
> \relative c'' {
>\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) \times
> 2/3 {
>\repeat percent 2 {g8 f g f g f g f g
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement
New issue 2439 by ralphbug...@gmail.com: tupletSpannerDuration and percent
repeat conflict
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2439
Lenore Horner lenorehor...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
\version "2.14.2"
\paper{ ragged
> I'm not top posting.
\version "2.14.2"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\relative c'' {
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) \times 2/3 {
\repeat percent 2 {g8 f g f g f g f g f g f }
} \unset tupletSpannerDuration
}
Produces
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #4 on issue 1574 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOC: Need
updated/expanded documentation of percent repeat/beat slash
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1574
Verified 2.15.0
___
bug-lilypond
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #3 on issue 1574 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOC: Need
updated/expanded documentation of percent repeat/beat slash
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1574
Doc entry LGTM
Comment #2 on issue 1574 by pkx1...@gmail.com: DOC: Need updated/expanded
documentation of percent repeat/beat slash
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1574
Pushed as commit
85fe0f15000f793435221fab2688ba3fa65a028f
___
bug
Comment #1 on issue 1574 by pkx1...@gmail.com: DOC: Need updated/expanded
documentation of percent repeat/beat slash
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1574
Posted patch for review
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273125
___
bug
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-High
New issue 1574 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOC: Need updated/expanded
documentation of percent repeat/beat slash
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1574
Issue http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail
On 31.12.2009, at 15:18, Corien Prins wrote:
I'm not top posting.
% When percent repeat is used in drummode, all output in the
% same score after the repeat is messed up: the different voices
% creat their own staff with a different clef.
% When 'percent' is replaced by &#x
> I'm not top posting.
% When percent repeat is used in drummode, all output in the
% same score after the repeat is messed up: the different voices
% creat their own staff with a different clef.
% When 'percent' is replaced by 'unfold' or 'volta' it w
2008/6/23 Roman Stawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> When using percent repeats in a score with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext,
> repeated bars disappear after a line wrap.
Thanks, added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=642
Cheers,
Valentin
> I'm not top posting.
When using percent repeats in a score with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext,
repeated bars disappear after a line wrap.
\version "2.11.49"
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\context StaffGroup <<
\new Staff {
\clef treble
\time 6/8
\relative c'' {
\repeat unfol
ve not been able to find a
> > workaround. If one part has precent repeats and another part has
> > measures that begin with a grace note, then the percent repeats will be
> > mispositioned in the measures near the one with the grace note. This
> > can even result in a percent
Graham Percival wrote:
(from the manual, 6.7.3)
% 2.5.24+ (cvs), weird double-note with percent repeat.
{
\unfoldrepeats {
\repeat tremolo 8 {c'32 e' }
\repeat percent 4 { c''8 d'' }
}
}
thanks. Fixed.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(from the manual, 6.7.3)
% 2.5.24+ (cvs), weird double-note with percent repeat.
{
\unfoldrepeats {
\repeat tremolo 8 {c'32 e' }
\repeat percent 4 { c''8 d'' }
}
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.or
Hi,
Both bugs are fixed in 2.5.21. Thanks!
Erik
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 03.28, Bruce McIntyre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed two new issues with two-bar percent repeats.
>
> 1. If a two-bar percent-repeat is at the start of a piece,
> lilypond cannot continue:
>
Hi,
This bug has been fixed in 2.5.21.
Erik
\version "2.4.2"
\header {
texidoc = "A staff with only percent repeats is removed by
RemoveEmptyStaffContext"
reportedin = "2.4.2"
}
\layout {
\context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext }
}
<<
\new Staff \repeat percent 3 b1
\new Staff \repeat unfo
sts plus one multimeasure rest of length 1*8.
>
> The bugs were added as percent-repeat-mm-rest.ly and
> percent-repeat-no-one-to-print.ly, respectively.
>
> Erik
>
> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 03.28, Bruce McIntyre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've notic
e breaks every few bars.
>
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
Erik and Han-Wen,
It is exactly when you have line breaks that the solution is needed.
Forced or unforced doesn't matter. If, as the result of line breaks,
there is a line that begins with a percent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I would like to be able to specify percent repeats but have it
> > automagically unfold the measure at each new line. This would be
> > similar to chordChanges = ##t for chord names. Is there anything like
> > that?
>
> Not that I know of. I'm quite sure it's pos
ent repeats, then
> RemoveEmptyStaffContext removes the line. This gets me alot in ensemble
> scores where the bass and percussion are repetive and the melody parts
> are very busy. Is there anyway to avoid this?
Thanks, added the bug as percent-repeat-harakiri.ly
A workaround is to add invisible stuff to
single bar rests plus one multimeasure rest of length 1*8.
The bugs were added as percent-repeat-mm-rest.ly and
percent-repeat-no-one-to-print.ly, respectively.
Erik
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 03.28, Bruce McIntyre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed two new issues with two-bar p
Hello,
I've noticed two new issues with two-bar percent repeats.
1. If a two-bar percent-repeat is at the start of a piece,
lilypond cannot continue:
warning: no one to print a percent:
\repeat percent 2 {\twobar
}
Either substituting \onebar for \twoba
After:
\notes {
\repeat percent 4 { d8 } % D
}
I see:
warning: Don't know how to handle a percent repeat of this length.
although the output looks OK.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/ma
near the one with the grace note. This
can even result in a percent repeat mark at the very beginning of the
line.
Thanks
Dick Schoeller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://schoeller.ne.client2.attb
32 matches
Mail list logo
