On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
wrote:
> Now there is 1702, "Unaesthetic beam slope", which reflects this situation, I
> believe:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1702
Yes, it's the one. I was worried it could go unaddressed in the 2.15 dev cycle.
Thanks for
On Sun 24 Apr 2011, 18:51 Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
> > That said, the following code still produces the same message:
Hi, Valentin!
Yes, indeed, sorry for so late reply .)
> Greetings everybody, hi Mike,
>
> Since there's a lot
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> That said, the following code still produces the same message:
Greetings everybody, hi Mike,
Since there's a lot of activity wrt beaming code these days, I'm
wondering whether the possible regression I mentioned earlier is
likely to
That said, the following code still produces the same message:
\version "2.13.59"
<<
\new Staff = "md" \relative c' {
r4 r8 s s2
r4 r8 s s2
r4 e, r2 |
}
\new Staff = "mg" \relative c'' {
b8 f' c' \change Staff = "md" ~
2 \change Staff = "mg" |
\once \override Beam #'collision-
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
>> The cross-staff beams look a bit odd (the first note has a really
>> long stem).
>>
>> I'm surprised that there's problems as far back as 2.13.7, since
>> the main beaming work was quite recent.
>
> Indeed. I suspect the vertical spacin
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Well, the actual message (with 2.13.57) is:
> warning: no viable initial configuration found: may not find good
> beam slope
Yep, what you said.
> The cross-staff beams look a bit odd (the first note has a really
> long stem).
>
> I'm sur
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:39:58PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Have a look at the following snippet, pretty straightforward:
...
> This compiles fine, but with any recent build you'll get a "no viable
> configuration found" warning. Since I didn't remember having
> encountered such a warnin
Greetings everybody,
I've been pulling my hair all day long on this one, I may be getting
crazy or perhaps you'll be able to reproduce this as well;
Have a look at the following snippet, pretty straightforward:
<<
\new Staff = "md" \relative c' {
r4 r8 s s2
r4 r8 s s2
r4 e, r2 |
