If it's not too late, may i propose to include
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3628 in the next
2.18 release? I think it's harmless enough to be added.
best,
Janek
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
"David Kastrup" wrote in message
news:87bny8ype4@fencepost.gnu.org...
Federico Bruni writes:
2014-02-15 19:56 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
the translation t
"David Kastrup" wrote in message
news:87fvnkypza@fencepost.gnu.org...
"Phil Holmes" writes:
"David Kastrup" wrote in message
news:87vbwgyzlr@fencepost.gnu.org...
Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documenta
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> "David Kastrup" wrote in message
> news:87vbwgyzlr@fencepost.gnu.org...
>>
>> Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
>> into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
>> the translation team would have no realistic chanc
Federico Bruni writes:
> 2014-02-15 19:56 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>
>> Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
>> into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
>> the translation team would have no realistic chance to have a go at them
>> _if_ we
David Kastrup writes:
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
>> 2014-02-15 19:56 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>>
>>> Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
>>> into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
>>> the translation team would have no realistic chance
2014-02-15 19:56 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
> into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
> the translation team would have no realistic chance to have a go at them
> _if_ we happen to release 2.18.1 this we
"David Kastrup" wrote in message
news:87vbwgyzlr@fencepost.gnu.org...
Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
the translation team would have no realistic chance to have a go at them
_if_ we happen
2014-02-15 19:56 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>
> Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
> into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
> the translation team would have no realistic chance to have a go at them
> _if_ we happen to release 2.18.1 this w
Ok, I've tried doing a reasonable collection of what should go
into 2.18.1. This does not contain significant documentation patches:
the translation team would have no realistic chance to have a go at them
_if_ we happen to release 2.18.1 this weekend.
I've rolled a set of patches together that
10 matches
Mail list logo
