Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nicolas Sceaux escreveu:
>>> Yes, but this introduces a new problem. Putting stuff into lily module
>>> from a .ly file means that definitions from one .ly file will leak
>>> into another, which is also a problem.
>>
>> I don't understand: what leaks
Nicolas Sceaux escreveu:
>> Yes, but this introduces a new problem. Putting stuff into lily module
>> from a .ly file means that definitions from one .ly file will leak
>> into another, which is also a problem.
>
> I don't understand: what leaks into what?
if you do
lilypond file1.ly file2.ly
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nicolas Sceaux escreveu:
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> But I would be grateful for a short look at
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=162
>>
>> Ok, I'll look at it soon.
>
> Hmm,
>
> I think this in
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I would be grateful for a short look at
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=162
Ok, I'll look at it soon.
nicolas
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.g
Nicolas Sceaux escreveu:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Mats Bengtsson escreveu:
>>
>>> As already said, this is not available in the current manual and one
>>> problem is that
>>> this would still just tell a small part of the full syntax. Another
>> This should be rather eas
