Thanks for the quick fix and for your hard work with this problem! I can
confirm that the problem doesn't appear in version 2.23.14 (I have
tested with a larger score where similar problems showed up at several
places).
Hopefully, the indentation doesn't happen now.
Regards
/Mats
On
Le 23/09/2022 à 15:51, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Hi,
In the following example, I get a weird extra spacing between the first
and second line of lyrics. I've tried to reduce the example as much as
possible and if I for example change the clef of the melody line to
regular
Hi,
In the following example, I get a weird extra spacing between the first
and second line of lyrics. I've tried to reduce the example as much as
possible and if I for example change the clef of the melody line to
regular treble clef, or remove the introductory six bars or remove
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 4:30 PM Trevor Bača wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> LilyPond incorrectly compresses consecutive, proportionally spaced measures
> when the following conditions hold:
>
> 1. first measure in the sequence sets \proportionalNotationDuration; and
> 2. last measure in sequence is followed
\noBreak commands.
%%% BEGIN SPACING BUG %%%
\version "2.19.82"
\layout {
indent = #0
ragged-right = ##t
}
\new Staff
\with
{
\remove Time_signature_engraver
}
{
\time 2/8
\set Score.proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 32)
c'4
^ \markup \with-
Hi
This is an excerpt from random piece. If you add \noBreak command at the end of
measure 9 and 11, than the whole spacing becomes distorted! Bug?
\version 2.19.3
\include deutsch.ly
{
\time 2/4 \clef treble
cis' g' h'8. a'16 cis' g' h'8 cis' g' a'8 %1
c' fis'8 cis' g'4 c' a'8 %2
Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl wrote in message
news:5320b1e5e14a81.65351...@wp.pl...
Hi
This is an excerpt from random piece. If you add \noBreak command at the
end of measure 9 and 11, than the whole spacing becomes distorted! Bug?
\version 2.19.3
\include deutsch.ly
{
\time 2/4 \clef
.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n160373/noBreak.pdf
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/another-spacing-bug-noBreak-tp160371p160373.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
Karol Majewski karolm2 at wp.pl writes:
This is an excerpt from random piece. If you add \noBreak command at the
end of measure 9 and 11, than the whole
spacing becomes distorted! Bug?
Is the 'distorted' spacing better or worse than in the first case?
If we want different behavior, we would
Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:cakwqkfzu2gb0vknqox-z_3squup6ch4nkazdokmcqncpv0c...@mail.gmail.com...
\version 2.15.26
\score
{
\new Staff \relative c''
{
\times 2/3 {c4\ff c c}
}
}
It looks like the bracket is making space for the dynamic, but the
dynamic is
Hello,
On 18 January 2012 03:52, Jay Anderson horndud...@gmail.com wrote:
\version 2.15.26
\score
{
\new Staff \relative c''
{
\times 2/3 {c4\ff c c}
}
}
It looks like the bracket is making space for the dynamic, but the
dynamic is staying outside anyway. The same effect happens
\version 2.15.26
\score
{
\new Staff \relative c''
{
\times 2/3 {c4\ff c c}
}
}
It looks like the bracket is making space for the dynamic, but the
dynamic is staying outside anyway. The same effect happens with beamed
tuplets, but in that case there's no bracket to move. It was
Updates:
Status: Verified
Labels: fixed_2_13_47
Comment #4 on issue 1131 by pnorcks: Spacing bug with above lyrics
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1131
Verified that the commit pushed for issue 1483 adds the necessary
documentation.
Thanks
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 1131 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Spacing bug with
above lyrics
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1131
This has been fixed with documentation changes introduced with 1483
On 2010-11-21 05:13, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de
mailto:n...@a-kobel.de wrote:
See the attached example; with the increased
'nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing, the ChordNames run into the staves they
belong to.
No, it wasn't known. And
Comment #2 on issue 1131 by markpolesky: Spacing bug with above lyrics
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1131
Lyrics above a staff attach to the staff above, not the correct
staff below.
First, a gentle reminder to always include a \version line in the
bug-tracker. Future
...or is it known already? I completely lost track of what are
different bugs and which are not.
See the attached example; with the increased 'nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing,
the ChordNames run into the staves they belong to.
Note that this is not an artifical example; it's a simplistic, but
common
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de wrote:
...or is it known already? I completely lost track of what are different
bugs and which are not.
See the attached example; with the increased 'nonstaff-nonstaff-spacing,
the ChordNames run into the staves they belong to.
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Low
Comment #1 on issue 1131 by n.puttock: Spacing bug with above lyrics
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1131
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Attachments:
foo.png 29.5 KB
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High
New issue 1131 by PhilEHolmes: Spacing bug with above lyrics
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1131
Lyrics above a staff attach to the staff above, not the correct staff below.
\paper {
between-system-spacing
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:7ca3d5a31002201338p1b266004g5ef3b319f987d...@mail.gmail.com...
On 20 February 2010 20:59, Wilbert Berendsen lily...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Op zaterdag 20 februari 2010 schreef Neil:
Definitely looks like a bug. As a workaround, you could use
I'm not top posting.
Lyrics above a staff attach to the system above that staff. This was
tested with lilypond version 2.13.14, git revision:
9bb3914ce6cc9a61773d2018e572d651936bbf7d
% -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
%% This demonstrates that lyrics above the staff attach to the system
%% above,
On 20 February 2010 16:33, Michael Welsh Duggan m...@md5i.com wrote:
Lyrics above a staff attach to the system above that staff. This was
tested with lilypond version 2.13.14, git revision:
9bb3914ce6cc9a61773d2018e572d651936bbf7d
Definitely looks like a bug. As a workaround, you could use
Op zaterdag 20 februari 2010 schreef Neil:
Definitely looks like a bug. As a workaround, you could use
alignAboveContext instead.
or set staff-affinity in the above Lyrics to DOWN:
\score {
\new Lyrics = above \with {
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-affinity = #DOWN
}
On 20 February 2010 20:59, Wilbert Berendsen lily...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Op zaterdag 20 februari 2010 schreef Neil:
Definitely looks like a bug. As a workaround, you could use
alignAboveContext instead.
or set staff-affinity in the above Lyrics to DOWN:
Hmm, good point. In fact, that's part
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de wrote:
the attached file causes the last (Tab)Staff to run into the footer and
below.
Hi,
Thanks, I've managed to make a minimal example and I've added it as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=932
Cheers,
Hi,
the attached file causes the last (Tab)Staff to run into the footer and
below.
Looks related to http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=850
- but the error still occurs in the current git snapshot, and this one
is marked as fixed.
Cheers,
Alexander
\version 2.13.7
\header {
Updates:
Status: Verified
Mergedinto: -850
Comment #3 on issue 876 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Spacing bug: text
exceeding page footer
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=876
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@free.fr wrote:
%%% in the first page, text spread on the page footer (and beyond)
%%% before breaking to the next one.
Hi Nicolas,
it took me a while, but it's finally been added as
Comment #1 on issue 876 by paconet.org: Spacing bug: text exceeding page
footer
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=876
This is a dupe of #850 and was fixed by Joe b51279cfe1a
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue
Le 29 oct. 09 à 10:32, Valentin Villenave a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@free.fr
wrote:
%%% in the first page, text spread on the page footer (and beyond)
%%% before breaking to the next one.
Hi Nicolas,
it took me a while, but it's finally been
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 850
Comment #2 on issue 876 by v.villenave: Spacing bug: text exceeding page
footer
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=876
Indeed. Sorry for the noise.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
%%% in the first page, text spread on the page footer (and beyond)
%%% before breaking to the next one.
\version 2.13.4
#(set-default-paper-size a6)
\markuplines \huge {
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
On Friday 31 December 2004 14.35, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
I know I could adjust one note at a time, but I think it's more practical
to wait until you fix this. There is also a similar problem with
horizontal spacing, but that can be helped with a tweak.
The spacing of the fingering above
Agreed, this looks like a release-critical bug (unless it's intentional?)
A slightly shorter example:
\layout{ragged-right=##t}
\relative {
e8[ dis e dis]
}
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
From: Erik Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
CC: Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wiz Aus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spacing bug
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:46:33 +0200
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 10.23, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Still, I agree
From: Erik Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wiz Aus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], bug-lilypond@gnu.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spacing bug
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:27:14 +0200
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 23.55, Wiz Aus wrote:
But that's my point
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 23.55, Wiz Aus wrote:
From: Erik Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
CC: Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wiz Aus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spacing bug
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:46:33 +0200
On Wednesday 05
Wiz Aus wrote:
From: Erik Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
CC: Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wiz Aus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spacing bug
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:46:33 +0200
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 10.23, Mats Bengtsson wrote
Wiz Aus wrote:
The following file tries to squeeze onto one line when it clearly
doesn't fit (the double barline at the end is cut off, for a start):
What double bar line? Your last bar has only 5/8, so there is no bar
line printed at all. If you want a double bar line at the end of a
piece,
The following file tries to squeeze onto one line when it clearly doesn't fit
(the double barline at the end is cut off, for a start):
\relative{
\time 3/4
c8 d e f g a
c, d16 d e8 f g a
c, d e16 e f8 g a
c, d e f16 f g8 a
c,8. d16 e8 f g8. a16
r8 d, e f g a
c, d e f g r
r d
The following file tries to squeeze onto one line when it clearly doesn't
fit (the double barline at the end is cut off, for a start):
\relative{
\time 3/4
c8 d e f g a
c, d16 d e8 f g a
c, d e16 e f8 g a
c, d e f16 f g8 a
c,8. d16 e8 f g8. a16
r8 d, e f g a
c, d e f g r
r d e r f g
c,
On Friday 31 December 2004 09:14 pm, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Friday 31 December 2004 14.35, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
I've held off upgrading from 2.2.6 to 2.4.2 because I wanted to finish
a project.
I converted this file from 2.2.6 to 2.4.2 and the bug is still very much
present.
I've held off upgrading from 2.2.6 to 2.4.2 because I wanted to finish
a project.
I converted this file from 2.2.6 to 2.4.2 and the bug is still very much
present.
I know I could adjust one note at a time, but I think it's more practical
to wait until you fix this. There is also a similar
On Friday 31 December 2004 14.35, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
I've held off upgrading from 2.2.6 to 2.4.2 because I wanted to finish
a project.
I converted this file from 2.2.6 to 2.4.2 and the bug is still very much
present.
I know I could adjust one note at a time, but I think it's more
45 matches
Mail list logo
