Re: Tracker 1686 - Process question - separate Tracker Issues or handle patches as part of T1686?

2011-11-08 Thread Ian Hulin
Hi David On 08/11/11 08:45, David Kastrup wrote: > Ian Hulin writes: > >> o Move all the markup macros and markup definition procedures to a new >> (scm markup-facility-defs) module (this is the artist formerly known >> markup-macros.scm and the remaining code in markup.scm) >>- add (use-

Re: Tracker 1686 - Process question - separate Tracker Issues or handle patches as part of T1686?

2011-11-08 Thread David Kastrup
Ian Hulin writes: > o Move all the markup macros and markup definition procedures to a new > (scm markup-facility-defs) module (this is the artist formerly known > markup-macros.scm and the remaining code in markup.scm) >- add (use-modules (scm markup-facility-defs)) to all the scheme >

Tracker 1686 - Process question - separate Tracker Issues or handle patches as part of T1686?

2011-11-06 Thread Ian Hulin
(For especial attention of Graham, Bug Squad, David, Bertrand and \markup rewrite hackers) Hi all, I've been hacking away in the Guile V2 migration cave working on Tracker 1686. This is to provide LilyPond with the ability to produce compiled Scheme files which we can load and use and eventually