Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #5 on issue 713 by v.villenave: bus error with \bookpart
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=713
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Le 23 déc. 08 à 00:18, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Works well over here (Linux).
/Mats
Thank you all for testing it.
nicolas
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Works well over here (Linux).
/Mats
codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_11_66
Comment #2 on issue 713 by nicolas.sceaux: bus error with \bookpart
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=713
May the users having observed the bus error
Comment #4 on issue 713 by n.puttock: bus error with \bookpart
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=713
No problems here with the snippet above, or the files from Graham, Jon and
James.
One thing I noticed was that all the test files worked fine when
optimisation was
Comment #3 on issue 713 by pnorcks: bus error with \bookpart
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=713
The fix works for me, Nicolas. Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_11_66
Comment #2 on issue 713 by nicolas.sceaux: bus error with \bookpart
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=713
May the users having observed the bus error or seg fault test this fix
please?
commit
Updates:
Labels: Type-Defect
Comment #1 on issue 713 by nicolas.sceaux: bus error with \bookpart
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=713
In Paper_book::output_aux(), for a parent Paper_book, despite the looping:
for (SCM p = scm_reverse (bookparts_); scm_is_pair (p); p
Status: Accepted
Owner: nicolas.sceaux
New issue 713 by nicolas.sceaux: bus error with \bookpart
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=713
The following snippet may cause a bus error:
\version "2.11.65"
\bookpart {
\score {
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 139
Le 10 déc. 08 à 05:48, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
Can you verify that valgrind does not complain of your code? You'll
need to silence GUILE GC related warnings.
Still not able to reproduce on GNU/Linux, I'm trying to run valgrind.
Do you have a valgrind suppression file for guile gc ready? The
Le 10 déc. 08 à 05:48, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
Can you verify that valgrind does not complain of your code? You'll
need to silence GUILE GC related warnings.
I don't have Linux installed, valgrind seems linux only.
... I'm downloading a distro.
___
Can you verify that valgrind does not complain of your code? You'll
need to silence GUILE GC related warnings.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BDM, I still can't reproduce, and can't see what's wrong in the backtrace.
> Does someone have an idea how I c
Am 10.12.2008 um 00:09 schrieb John Mandereau:
Does someone have an idea how I could reproduce it, maybe changing an
optimization option? (I use -O2)
I don't know, except installing GNU/Linux on your computer :-)
I would say install OSX 10.4, but I think that's already installed
_
Le mardi 09 décembre 2008 à 21:36 +0100, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit :
> BDM, I still can't reproduce, and can't see what's wrong in the
> backtrace.
Might a core dump help?
> Does someone have an idea how I could reproduce it, maybe changing an
> optimization option? (I use -O2)
I don't know, exc
Le 9 déc. 08 à 19:01, Neil Puttock a écrit :
2008/12/9 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Here's what I get on a Fedora 9 x86_64 box with all recent updates,
compiling scores 1+...+5 (I get no segfault with 1+...+4, and I
also get
a segfault with all 8 scores enabled):
I get exactly the
2008/12/9 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here's what I get on a Fedora 9 x86_64 box with all recent updates,
> compiling scores 1+...+5 (I get no segfault with 1+...+4, and I also get
> a segfault with all 8 scores enabled):
I get exactly the same segfault under Ubuntu 8.10 x86_64 using ei
Hi Nicolas,
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 21:41 +0100, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit :
> Graham, I cannot reproduce the bus error (even compiling the 8
> scores.) Can you run lilypond with gdb and send me a backtrace?
Here's what I get on a Fedora 9 x86_64 box with all recent updates,
compiling scores 1+..
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 09:41:58PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Le 8 d?c. 08 ? 10:37, Graham Percival a ?crit :
>
>> I've attached a very non-minimal example of a bus error crash with
>> \bookpart. Each \bookpart{} (8 violin duets) works perfectly when
>> compiled on their own, but combining the
Le 8 déc. 08 à 10:37, Graham Percival a écrit :
I've attached a very non-minimal example of a bus error crash with
\bookpart. Each \bookpart{} (8 violin duets) works perfectly when
compiled on their own, but combining them all together leads to
problems.
Graham, I cannot reproduce the bus err
Am 08.12.2008 um 10:37 schrieb Graham Percival:
Hi Nicolas,
I've attached a very non-minimal example of a bus error crash with
\bookpart. Each \bookpart{} (8 violin duets) works perfectly when
compiled on their own, but combining them all together leads to
problems.
For example, I can compil
Hi Nicolas,
I've attached a very non-minimal example of a bus error crash with
\bookpart. Each \bookpart{} (8 violin duets) works perfectly when
compiled on their own, but combining them all together leads to
problems.
For example, I can compile pieces 1+2+3 together, or 3+4+5
together with no p
20 matches
Mail list logo
