erto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-no-repeat-and-missing-accidentals-tp194485p194499.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 13.09.2016 17:35, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
As the example above shows, when a second note or chord is not identical to
a first chord but contains one or more identical pitches, these do not get
accidentals.
Which I think is perfectly in line with the intended behaviour of the
accidental ru
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n194485/26.png>
Regards,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dodecaphonic-no-repeat-and-missing-accidentals-tp194485.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
