ably don't, and it
> will save you time and energy if you do XYZ instead".
>
>
OK, let's just add a small note, see
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2476&thanks=2476&ts=1334313574
Eluze
--
View this message in con
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:21:57PM -0700, -Eluze wrote:
>
> just a question: could we get rid of these -doptions?
Maybe as many as 5 of them. Not more.
> since shortly at least 50% (or is it 80% ? ) can be defined directly in
> LilyPond without any loss of comfort/functionality - or do I overl
o another file?
for me personally the option include-settings is very important and I'd like
to propose an upgrade to a basic option.
please let me know your opinion - I would be happy to discuss and integrate
it in these plans
thanks!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:35:51PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> I envisage users unfamiliar with command line quoting on Windows
> wasting a lot of time on this. There is sufficient material here for a
> documentation suggestion. If Eluze is happy to prepare one then I see
> no reason not to document
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:56:20PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:12:36AM +0100, James wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On 12 April 2012 01:28, Colin Hall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:45:42A
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:12:36AM +0100, James wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 12 April 2012 01:28, Colin Hall wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:45:42AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I can run LilyPond with
> > >> --inclu
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:12:36AM +0100, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12 April 2012 01:28, Colin Hall wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:45:42AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
> >>
> >> I can run LilyPond with
> >> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit.ly"
> >>
> >> if th
Hello,
On 12 April 2012 01:28, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:45:42AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
>>
>> I can run LilyPond with
>> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit.ly"
>>
>> if the init file contains a blank it doesn't work
>> --include="D:/data/ly/inclu
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:45:42AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
>
> I can run LilyPond with
> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit.ly"
>
> if the init file contains a blank it doesn't work
> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit 2.ly"
>
> I have
While evaluating arguments to cons in expression (cons
(quote include-settings) (quote myInit\) ...):
:1:7: Unbound variable: 2.ly
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/include-settings-and-path-or-file-name-with-blanks-tp33661145p33661329.html
Sent from the Gn
Hello,
On 10 April 2012 13:45, -Eluze wrote:
>
> I can run LilyPond with
> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit.ly"
>
> if the init file contains a blank it doesn't work
> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit 2.ly"
>
> I have to use 4 sets
hello,
On 10 April 2012 13:45, -Eluze wrote:
>
> I can run LilyPond with
> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit.ly"
>
> if the init file contains a blank it doesn't work
> --include="D:/data/ly/includes - copy" -dinclude-settings="myInit 2.ly"
>
> I have to use 4 sets
- copy/myInit 2.ly""""
so we have the funny situation where we can write
lilypond -I"D:/data/ly/includes - copy"
-dinclude-settings=""""D:/data/ly/includes - copy/myInit 2.ly"""" test.ly
should this be documented or is there a ch
13 matches
Mail list logo
