Re: inconsistent treatment of vertical spacing variables?

2013-07-31 Thread Ralph Palmer
> > > > > eluzew@ > > > > writes: > > > >> why do we have to specify a list for the > >> VerticalAxisGroup.staff-staff-spacing while e.g. for the > >> StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing you can define single items and also > all > >> the other vertical spacers like default-staff-staff-spacing, > >> n

Re: inconsistent treatment of vertical spacing variables?

2013-07-30 Thread Eluze
# >)' must be of type `list' Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/inconsistent-treatment-of-vertical-spacing-variables-tp148551p148559.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: inconsistent treatment of vertical spacing variables?

2013-07-30 Thread David Kastrup
Eluze writes: > why do we have to specify a list for the > VerticalAxisGroup.staff-staff-spacing while e.g. for the > StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing you can define single items and also all > the other vertical spacers like default-staff-staff-spacing, > nonstaff-relatedstaff-spacing, nonstaff-

inconsistent treatment of vertical spacing variables?

2013-07-30 Thread Eluze
etc. accept single values? Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/inconsistent-treatment-of-vertical-spacing-variables-tp148551.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-lilypond mailing