I added this to cvs.
%
%
\header {texidoc = "
Noteheads from voices 2, 3 and 4 collide.
"}
\version "2.3.11"
<< a''2 \\ g''2 \\ f''2 \\ e''2>>
===
begin 644 notehead-collision.png
MB5!.1PT*&@[EMAIL PROTECTED]&H```!2"`(S:M8'3TE$051XG.V;
M06C37AS'[EMAIL PROT
Hi,
Here are flags invading the inside of half-notes:
% flags.ly
\version "2.4.2"
{
\clef bass
<< {b8 r4.} \\ b2 >>
<< {b16 r4..} \\ b2 >>
<< {b32 r4...} \\ b2 >>
<< {b64 r4} \\ b2 >>
}
% end
Thanks,
Yuval
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-li
Thanks, added as c-flag-notehead.
On Saturday 29 January 2005 01.57, Yuval Harel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are flags invading the inside of half-notes:
>
> % flags.ly
> \version "2.4.2"
>
> {
> \clef bass
> << {b8 r4.} \\ b2 >>
> << {b16 r4..} \\ b2 >>
> << {b32 r4...} \\ b2 >>
> << {b64 r4} \\ b2
Status: Started
Owner: k-ohara5...@oco.net
Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Medium Patch-new
New issue 1792 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: dot-notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792
%% Dots should move where we can see them,
%% or, if dots need to move and we ask for
/13.png>
Cheers,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/flag-and-notehead-collision-with-certain-chords-tp195330.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing li
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review
Comment #1 on issue 1792 by pkx1...@gmail.com: dot-notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792
Passes make and reg tests although in my case, the reg test 'before' was
different - see attached:
Not sur
Comment #2 on issue 1792 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: dot-notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792
the reg test 'before' was different
As part of the patch, I needed to expand the regression test.
I used the expanded test as the bug report. The be
Comment #4 on issue 1792 by n.putt...@gmail.com: dot-notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792
Did I miss the countdown for this?
Why does the second beat still look bad even with prefer-dotted-right =
#t? The lower voice's dot looks as if it's a
Comment #5 on issue 1792 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: dot-notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792
With the fix above for this issue, the behavior matches the documentation.
"prefer-dotted-right (boolean) : For note collisions, prefer to shift
dotted up-no
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #6 on issue 1792 by brownian.box: dot-notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
On 14.10.2016 17:28, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hello all,
Recently I realized that some eighth note chords have their flags either too
close to the noteheads or sometimes even colliding with them.
I’m pretty sure that this is not a bug, but fully intentional. I like it.
At least you’d have to
k of collisions look much better to me.
Take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/flag-and-notehead-collision-with-certain-chords-tp195330p195333.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I am pretty sure that I read that this is done on purpose, that the flag
can touch the note head and that the distance of the elements of a 16th,
32nd, etc. flag are derived from the distance of staff lines. But after
quite some searching I could not find the article I am talking about.
And I
Gilberto Agostinho wrote Friday, October 14, 2016 7:11 PM
> I think part of the problem is that the amount of collision is not even
> constant for the cases above. Compare the very bottom system on the image I
> posted, note how the flag barely touches the bottom note a' but completely
> collides
On 14.10.2016 20:11, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Simon,
I think part of the problem is that the amount of collision is not even
constant for the cases above. Compare the very bottom system on the image I
posted, note how the flag barely touches the bottom note a' but completely
collides with th
written
as a filled black note-head with a stem and flag (tail)." Anyway, I think
this is just choice of vocabulary and so it shouldn't really matter.
Cheers!
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/flag-and-notehead-collision-with-certain-cho
Issue 339: possibly misplaced dot in notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=339
Comment #4 by hanwenn:
Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
I wrote out an organ accompaniment in LilyPond (to get it onto 4 pages
instead of 13), and it illustrates this sit
Issue 339: possibly misplaced dot in notehead collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=339
Comment #5 by v.villenave:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Verified
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
18 matches
Mail list logo