Re: patch labels in CG manual

2016-06-05 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen writes: > James, > > On 5/20/16 10:15 AM, "James" wrote: >> >>One thing to realise and I think people have forgotten is that the >>Patchy-testing scripts (rather than Patchy-merge scripts) no longer work >>as they were written to scrape the old

Re: patch labels in CG manual

2016-05-24 Thread Phil Holmes
"James" wrote in message news:57433776.4010...@gnu.org... Carl, On 23/05/16 16:43, Carl Sorensen wrote: James, On 5/20/16 10:15 AM, "James" wrote: One thing to realise and I think people have forgotten is that the Patchy-testing scripts (rather than

Re: patch labels in CG manual

2016-05-23 Thread James
Carl, On 23/05/16 16:43, Carl Sorensen wrote: James, On 5/20/16 10:15 AM, "James" wrote: One thing to realise and I think people have forgotten is that the Patchy-testing scripts (rather than Patchy-merge scripts) no longer work as they were written to scrape the old Google

Re: patch labels in CG manual

2016-05-23 Thread Carl Sorensen
James, On 5/20/16 10:15 AM, "James" wrote: > > >One thing to realise and I think people have forgotten is that the >Patchy-testing scripts (rather than Patchy-merge scripts) no longer work >as they were written to scrape the old Google tracker and don't work >with Allura. > >So

Re: patch labels in CG manual

2016-05-20 Thread James
Federico, On 20/05/16 09:34, Federico Bruni wrote: Hi I have a few questions about the section "Patch label" in: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/issue-classification Patch-new: the patch has not been checked for “obvious” mistakes. When in doubt, use this tag.

patch labels in CG manual

2016-05-20 Thread Federico Bruni
Hi I have a few questions about the section "Patch label" in: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/issue-classification Patch-new: the patch has not been checked for “obvious” mistakes. When in doubt, use this tag. Patch-review: the patch has no “obvious” mistakes (as