On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 10:30 AM, James Bailey
wrote:
> As shown in the attached image, the \mark \markup is placed too far to the
> left in 2.13.9. It was fine in 2.12. My question is, how should I add this
> to the tracker?
Hi James,
sorry for the delay. I've added this to the tracker, it look
On 25.12.2009, at 15:35, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 03:05:42PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
On 25.12.2009, at 14:04, John Mandereau wrote:
In which 2.13 release this bug appeared? A quick bisection
(testing no
more than four 2.13.x versions) should give the answer.
2.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 03:05:42PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
>
> On 25.12.2009, at 14:04, John Mandereau wrote:
>
>> In which 2.13 release this bug appeared? A quick bisection (testing no
>> more than four 2.13.x versions) should give the answer.
>
> 2.13.7. Can you explain this (testing no more
On 25.12.2009, at 14:04, John Mandereau wrote:
Le vendredi 25 décembre 2009 à 10:30 +0100, James Bailey a écrit :
I include the old version statement, because that's the one in the
regression test, where this worked, although the problem only shows
up with the new version.
In which 2.13 rele
Le vendredi 25 décembre 2009 à 10:30 +0100, James Bailey a écrit :
> I include the old version statement, because that's the one in the
> regression test, where this worked, although the problem only shows
> up with the new version.
In which 2.13 release this bug appeared? A quick bisection (
As shown in the attached image, the \mark \markup is placed too far
to the left in 2.13.9. It was fine in 2.12. My question is, how
should I add this to the tracker? I'm not quite certain under what
circumstances the mark is so far to the left, and the problem is (I
think) more with the \ma
