Dear Neil,
THanx It works great. And further the new accidental (dodecaphonic)
mode is great !
Great work THanx to u all
Karim
On Sep 17, 2008, at 10:32 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Karim,
Just to let you know, we've just changed the code for rationals so
they use 64 bits of precision
of your snippet using the new code; it's much
improved since it correctly renders the whole system.
Amazing result!
Will this 64 bits stuff work on 32 bits PCs?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/spacing%2C-version-2.10-and-2.11-tp18665268p19557365.html
Sent from the Gnu
Hi Karim,
Just to let you know, we've just changed the code for rationals so
they use 64 bits of precision rather than 32. This should hopefully
solve the problems you've been having. The new code will be in the
next development release, 2.11.59.
I've attached a re-run of your snippet using
2008/7/29 Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/7/26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This files compiles on the stable version but hangs on the 2.11. (i.e
it
keeps compiling).
Is there a reason and how to by-pass it ?
Hi Karim,
stupid question: have you tried to let LilyPond work for more than
2008/7/29 Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/7/26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This files compiles on the stable version but hangs on the 2.11. (i.e it
keeps compiling).
Is there a reason and how to by-pass it ?
Hi Karim,
stupid question: have you tried to let LilyPond work for more than
2008/7/26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This files compiles on the stable version but hangs on the 2.11. (i.e it
keeps compiling).
Is there a reason and how to by-pass it ?
Hi Karim,
stupid question: have you tried to let LilyPond work for more than
twelve hours without doing anything else with your
Hello,
It seems that concerning the spacing there's a big difference with verison
2.10.33 and 2.11.53
This files compiles on the stable version but hangs on the 2.11. (i.e it
keeps compiling).
Is there a reason and how to by-pass it ?
Thank you
KArim
spacing.ly
Description: Binary data
