Arno Waschk wrote Sunday, March 21, 2010 3:59 PM
But should not lilypond define a default minimum-length that makes
it at least visible. Or if it does (what i would assume), why
does it not work?
Well, the bracket is small but perfectly visible in
2.13.14 (the version I happened to use to c
Trevor, thanks for the help.
But should not lilypond define a default minimum-length that makes it at
least visible. Or if it does (what i would assume), why does it not work?
Thanks again, Arno
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:16 +0100, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
Arno Waschk wrote Sunday, March
Arno Waschk wrote Sunday, March 21, 2010 2:59 PM
But is there really a difference - from user point of view -
between no bracket and an pretty much invisible one?
And is there a way to force the pretty much invisible bracket to
be visible without actual change to the score content - in
opp
Dear Francisco and list,
Aha, thanks!
But is there really a difference - from user point of view - between no
bracket and an pretty much invisible one?
And is there a way to force the pretty much invisible bracket to be
visible without actual change to the score content - in opposite to wh
2010/3/21 Arno Waschk :
> Dear list,
>
> the following ...
>
>
> \version "2.13.13"
> \relative c''{\times 4/5{r16 c4~}\times 4/5{c4 r16}}
>
> gives here (ubuntu)
>
> a tuplet without bracket in the first half, but a tuplet with bracket in the
> second half.
I see brackets on both halves, the firs
Dear list,
the following ...
\version "2.13.13"
\relative c''{\times 4/5{r16 c4~}\times 4/5{c4 r16}}
gives here (ubuntu)
a tuplet without bracket in the first half, but a tuplet with bracket in
the second half.
Is that a bug or a feature?
Yours, Arno
___
