Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread David Bobroff
On 3/3/2012 10:17 AM, David Kastrup wrote: James writes: On 3 March 2012 09:11, David Kastrup wrote: No. It means that we start counting again, and so far, we have not counted a single beat because a cadenza does not count. The manual bar line does not change that. You can probably writ

Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > On 3 March 2012 09:11, David Kastrup wrote: > >> No.  It means that we start counting again, and so far, we have not >> counted a single beat because a cadenza does not count. >> The manual bar line does not change that.  You can probably write something like << {

Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread James
David, On 3 March 2012 09:11, David Kastrup wrote: > James writes: > >> On 3 March 2012 08:55, David Kastrup wrote: >>> David Bobroff writes: >>> I got a surprise when a cancelling accidental was printed at the beginning of a measure.  This happened following a cadenza.  Short e

Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread David Kastrup
James writes: > On 3 March 2012 08:55, David Kastrup wrote: >> David Bobroff writes: >> >>> I got a surprise when a cancelling accidental was printed at the >>> beginning of a measure.  This happened following a cadenza.  Short >>> example below: >>> >>> >>> %%% >>> \version "2.14.2" >>> >>> \r

Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread James
David, On 3 March 2012 08:55, David Kastrup wrote: > David Bobroff writes: > >> I got a surprise when a cancelling accidental was printed at the >> beginning of a measure.  This happened following a cadenza.  Short >> example below: >> >> >> %%% >> \version "2.14.2" >> >> \relative c' >> { >>  

Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread David Kastrup
David Bobroff writes: > I got a surprise when a cancelling accidental was printed at the > beginning of a measure. This happened following a cadenza. Short > example below: > > > %%% > \version "2.14.2" > > \relative c' > { > \key c \major > \cadenzaOn > fis4 g a b > \cadenzaOff > \ba

Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread James
Hello, On 3 March 2012 08:11, David Bobroff wrote: > I got a surprise when a cancelling accidental was printed at the beginning > of a measure.  This happened following a cadenza.  Short example below: > > > %%% > \version "2.14.2" > > \relative c' > { >  \key c \major >  \cadenzaOn >  fis4 g a b

unexpected accidental following cadenza

2012-03-03 Thread David Bobroff
I got a surprise when a cancelling accidental was printed at the beginning of a measure. This happened following a cadenza. Short example below: %%% \version "2.14.2" \relative c' { \key c \major \cadenzaOn fis4 g a b \cadenzaOff \bar "|" f } %%% Is this a bug? -David __