%% "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jb> In a makefile like presented in the first response to this issue,
jb> it is claimed that it is appropriate for $? to be empty. However,
jb> I would assume that if $? is empty and if the target exists, then
jb> there is no need to remake the
%% "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ams> Please revert the POSIX_ME_HARDER change of backslash-newline
ams> sequences are handled. There is absolutley no reason to break
ams> this. Lots of old Makefile use it, and so do many new ones. If
ams> one wishes to follow POSIX, o
Wait, I find I need to do
bla:
perl -wlne 'if(/^Get:/)[EMAIL PROTECTED];splice(@e,0,3);'"\
"'$$_=join(q{ },@e)}print' zzz
to make it work with both old and new make.
Assuming I don't want to look into the contents, and instead just
modify the front and back of each line.
_
