>> >Fix applied.
>>
>> Could you commit the fix into CVS?
>
>I definitely can, but is that really useful? The current state of the
>CVS HEAD is pretty pre-alpha: it's right in the middle of a lot of code
>rework.
>
>It seems to me that the safest thing is to apply the simple patch
>attached to t
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 14:41 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Fix applied.
>
> Could you commit the fix into CVS?
I definitely can, but is that really useful? The current state of the
CVS HEAD is pretty pre-alpha: it's right in the middle of a lot of code
rework.
It seems to me that the safes
>Update of bug #18680 (project make):
>Follow-up Comment #1:
>
>Doh! Silly. As a lame excuse I'll mention that the original
>fix was for
>situations where errno was not 0 _before_ invoking the macro,
>not where it
>was set to 0 inside the macro. However it should have been
>obvious that th
