[bug #15919] Make-3.81 rc1 hangs with -j 2 but not with -j 1

2007-08-15 Thread Icarus Sparry
Follow-up Comment #23, bug #15919 (project make): Glad its fixed. Now all I need do is work on you to get a quick release out the door. I no longer have access to the codebase that provoked the original bug report, the company has gone "dot bust". ___

[bug #3330] gmake -j2 does very different things to gmake -j1

2007-08-15 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #3330 (project make): Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => psmith Open/Closed:Open => Closed Fixed Release:

[bug #15919] Make-3.81 rc1 hangs with -j 2 but not with -j 1

2007-08-15 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #15919 (project make): Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => psmith Open/Closed:Open => Closed Fixed Release:

Re: Single-suffix rules broken?

2007-08-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > >> I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule: >> >> .SUFFIXES = .in > ^ ^ > I think, you mixed some syntax here. It's either > > SUFFIXES = .in > > for autom

Re: Single-suffix rules broken?

2007-08-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 12 August 2007 15:07, Ludovic "Courtes" wrote: > > >> Am I missing something > > The fact that you already sent this yesterday and it already got answered > two hours before you resent it? Indeed. :-) Apologies for the noise. (Actually, it t

RE: gnumake[1]: execvp: /bin/sh: The parameter or environmentlists are too long

2007-08-15 Thread Dave Korn
On 15 August 2007 04:59, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 22:31 -0400, Kothanda_Sathya wrote: >> How it looks on our GNUmakefile, if sources specified within the limit >> around 450, this error occurs otherwise it reports error the parameter >> or environment list are too long. > > The m