On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 16:11, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Michael Witten wrote:
>> The `--dry-run' flag is supposed to be safe in that nothing
>> in the file system is actually modified.
>
> That's not actually true. To quote the docs:
>
> `-n'
> `--just-print'
> `--
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Michael Witten wrote:
> The `--dry-run' flag is supposed to be safe in that nothing
> in the file system is actually modified.
That's not actually true. To quote the docs:
`-n'
`--just-print'
`--dry-run'
`--recon'
"No-op". The activity is to print what reci
The `--dry-run' flag is supposed to be safe in that nothing
in the file system is actually modified. Unfortunately,
the `--touch' flag completely ignores this fact, resulting
in all kinds of unsavory and inappropriate touching.
This patch quashes such deviant behavior and ensures future
compliance
