On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 19:20 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Paul Smith
> > Cc: bo...@kolpackov.net, bug-make@gnu.org, f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de
> > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:44:39 -0400
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 16:43 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure what the semantics of
This is all, of course, with sources from git.
If configure contains the line continuation ('\') in AC_CONFIG_FILES,
then we end up with this lovely construct in configure:
"config/Makefile") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES config/Makefile" ;;
"\") CONFIG_FILES="$CONFIG_FILES \" ;;
"doc/Ma
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bo...@kolpackov.net, bug-make@gnu.org, f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:44:39 -0400
>
> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 16:43 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what the semantics of tmpfile() are on Windows.
> >
> > The file is automatically deleted
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 15:31 +0100, Tim Murphy wrote:
> So this is great and you can see that there are 4 targets in my
> makefile and that each one is a "start X" followed by an "end X". I
> don't see any enter/exit delimitation - have I missed out some option?
Um. Yes, the enter/leave only hap
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 16:43 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the semantics of tmpfile() are on Windows.
>
> The file is automatically deleted when closed. But the documentation
> doesn't say what happens if it is open on more than one descriptor, or
> what happens if the original
Thanks Eli,
On systems where move *is* a built-in, gnumake fails as CreateProcess(NULL,
"move" ...) doesn't work.
On systems where move *is not* a built-in, my proposed fix is fine as
"cmd.exe /c move" still works.
Cheers,
Ray.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date:
Hi,
I tried it out. It all works as I imagined - you were perfectly clear:
bash-4.2$ ./make -Otarget -j 5 -f test.mk
start a
end a
start b
end b
start c
end c
start d
end d
So this is great and you can see that there are 4 targets in my makefile
and that each one is a "start X" followed by an "e
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bo...@kolpackov.net, bug-make@gnu.org, f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:47:08 -0400
>
> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 11:30 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 05:54:13 +
> > > From: "Paul D. Smith"
> > >
> > > I did a little bit of c
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:41:53 +0100
> From: Ray Donnelly
>
> This is just for reference for anyone who wants to build gnumake on
> Windows. I don't want it to be applied as the real bugs are in Autotools.
What are the bugs, and how do they manifest themselves?
__
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:39:58 +0100
> From: Ray Donnelly
>
> 'move' is not listed as a cmd.exe builtin when it needs to be.
>
>
> Not sure how this hasn't been spotted and fixed before now!
It's not a bug, it is done on purpose: 'move' is a built-in on some
versions of Windows, and a .exe
Oops!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 13:40 +0100, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> > Pretty simple, needs little explanation.
>
> Maybe not but a patch would be nice :-) :-p
>
>
>
0003-Compile-fix-for-when-not-using-output-sync.patch
Description: Binary data
_
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 09:57 +0100, Tim Murphy wrote:
> When most rules are a single job this doesn't seem important but when
> you're doing anything non trivial it becomes hard to see what is
> where.
Just to be clear: in this implementation the output from all individual
commands in a recipe are
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 13:40 +0100, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> Pretty simple, needs little explanation.
Maybe not but a patch would be nice :-) :-p
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
This is just for reference for anyone who wants to build gnumake on
Windows. I don't want it to be applied as the real bugs are in Autotools.
Best regards,
Ray Donnelly.
0004-Windows-MSYS-Autotools-doc-disabling-hack.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Pretty simple, needs little explanation.
Best regards,
Ray Donnelly.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
'move' is not listed as a cmd.exe builtin when it needs to be.
Not sure how this hasn't been spotted and fixed before now!
Best regards,
Ray Donnelly.
0002-Windows-Add-move-to-sh_cmds_dos.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bu
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 09:57 +0100, Tim Murphy wrote:
> What would be super cool is being able to get make to expand some sort
> of variable at the start and another one at the end of the output so
> that there was a way to see where one rule ended and the next one
> began.
Well, the new feature ad
Because this modifies a batch file with Windows line endings it must
be applied with --keep-cr, e.g.:
git am 0001-Windows-Add-load.c-to-build_w32.bat.patch --keep-cr
Best regards,
Ray Donnelly.
0001-Windows-Add-load.c-to-build_w32.bat.patch
Description: Binary data
_
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 01:34 -0700, Jim Michaels wrote:
> I have been toying with this idea of parallel builds to gain project
> compile speed (reducing time to a fraction) for quite a while.
Can you explain the difference between what you're suggesting and the
existing --jobs (-j) feature availabl
feature request: parallelize make builds.
current problem: make is serial in nature. there is room for making it
series-parallel.
I have been toying with this idea of parallel builds to gain project compile
speed (reducing time to a fraction) for quite a while.
compiles seem to spend more time
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 11:30 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 05:54:13 +
> > From: "Paul D. Smith"
> >
> > I did a little bit of code rearrangement, but I still think this code will
> > not
> > work on Windows and might possibly not compile on Windows.
>
> Indeed, it wi
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:56:01 +0100
> From: Tim Murphy
>
> IMHO, get it in and fix the details later because as it is it's exceedingly
> useful.
It's already in, that's what Paul's message was about.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http
[sorry to Eli for forgetting to replay-all]
This is an awesome feature, especially for anyone trying to parse huge
parallel build logs with errors in them - used to have this problem where
you couldn't work out why X.cpp had that error at line 21 and realised that
it was because that error didn't
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 05:54:13 +
> From: "Paul D. Smith"
>
> I did a little bit of code rearrangement, but I still think this code will not
> work on Windows and might possibly not compile on Windows.
Indeed, it will not. Some cursory comments below.
> Hopefully we can fix that.
We sha
24 matches
Mail list logo
