On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 00:44 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> The test 'features/output-sync' now fails for me:
>
> Test timed out after 6 seconds
> Error running /storage/home/stefano/src/gnu/make/tests/../make \
> (expected 0; got 14): /storage/home/stefano/src/gnu/make/tests/../make \
>
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 04:37 +0200, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> > COMMANDS_RECURSE _does_ mean to recurse. The reason for the '+'
> > prerequisite is to tell make that this line, even though it may not look
> > like it, will run a recursive make.
>
> OK, let me just say that the meaning of "recursiv
Paul Smith wrote:
> The first one I've seen but hadn't had time to debug. I'll look at your
> patch. I left the truncate where it was rather than doing it after the
> sync_output() because I was hoping to avoid truncating a file that we'll
> never use again anyway, but I guess it isn't a big dea
* doc/make.texi: Here. It was sufficient to change an '@itemx'
into an '@item'.
Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini
---
doc/make.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/make.texi b/doc/make.texi
index ea58d6e..fa9b5d7 100644
---
Hi Paul.
On 05/05/2013 12:10 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 12:55 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>> Suppose we do this: if we're about to invoke a line marked recursive
>> and we're in -Otarget mode, then before we run it we'll show the
>> current contents of the temp file (using the norm
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 12:55 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Suppose we do this: if we're about to invoke a line marked recursive
> and we're in -Otarget mode, then before we run it we'll show the
> current contents of the temp file (using the normal synchronized
> output function).
I've implemented thi
Should the Make manual include instructions, however short, about
building extensions? Not writing the code (that is covered), but
actually compiling the extensions so that Make will be able to load
them.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http
>> I think having this facility built into make is a win, especially as
>> parallel builds become predominant. I would be even more happy about it
>> if we can get it to the point where it can be enabled by default, and
>> users don't even have to worry about it.
> I agree with Paul. This is some
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 08:57 +0200, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> I shouldn't have written that. :-( Shortly afterwards, I found a bug
> or perhaps two:
>
> foo:
> @echo foo
> +@echo bar
>
> (a)
> % make -Ojob
> foo
> bar
> foo
>
> (b)
> % make -Otarget
> bar
> foo
>
> As you see, (a
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: reinp...@win.tue.nl, bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 09:04:24 -0400
>
> you may see this:
>
> xa
> xb
> a
> $(MAKE) foo
> xc
> xd
> b
If "a" appears before "xb", then that's all I ask for.
> > If we want it to be "no worse", then why do we need
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 09:57 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Paul Smith
> > Cc: reinp...@win.tue.nl, bug-make@gnu.org
> > Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 16:51:47 -0400
> >
> > > I think enabling [-O] by default will be a no-brainer if/when we come up
> > > with a way to get it to produce the same ou
On 05/04/2013 01:34 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 11:52 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Ping? Any reason not to apply this trivial patch?
>
> You may have noticed, there's a lot going on right now... and I do have
> an actually for-$$ job as well :-). Many of these kinds of th
On 04/30/2013 03:37 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's 'codespell' tool.
>
> * ChangeLog: Fix minor typos.
> * ChangeLog.2: Likewise.
> * README.Amiga: Likewise.
> * TODO.private: Likewise.
> * function.c: Likewise.
> * glob/glob.h: Likewise.
> * job.c:
> Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 04:42:32 +0200
> Cc: e...@gnu.org, david.s.bo...@gmail.com, bug-make@gnu.org
> From: Frank Heckenbach
>
> : /* This is needed to avoid the "label at end of compound statement"
> : diagnostics on Posix platforms. */
>
> I don't think that's a POSIX thing (which is
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: stefano.lattar...@gmail.com, bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 17:17:44 -0400
>
> -O in no way changes that behavior, all it does is ensure that output
> from any individual line or target of the recipe will not interfere with
> any other individual line or target
15 matches
Mail list logo
