Hi all. I've recently pushed changes to solve the last open issues that
I'm aware of with the --output-sync feature:
* If command line printing is not suppressed ("@" is not used) the
command line is attached to the output.
* Extraneous enter/leave lines are not printed any lo
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> On 05/05/2013 05:30 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 11:11 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> Sorry to add this only now, but I realized the failure is only
>>> reproducible if I run the testsuite with "make -j", as in "make
On 05/05/2013 05:30 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 11:11 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Sorry to add this only now, but I realized the failure is only
>> reproducible if I run the testsuite with "make -j", as in "make -j8
>> check; and even in that case, the failure is racy. Wit
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:56:48 -0400
>
> On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 19:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > However, I wonder what was the reason for splitting the definition of
> > GMK_EXPORT in two, and putting each part in a different file.
>
> Well, beca
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 19:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> However, I wonder what was the reason for splitting the definition of
> GMK_EXPORT in two, and putting each part in a different file.
Well, because the gnumake.h file is intended to be installed into the
user's /usr/include or similar, and
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 17:51:05 -0400
>
> Eli, I did some cleanup in job.c to try to make things simpler and
> reduce duplication. I tried to be careful but it's quite possible I did
> something to disrupt the Windows version again. It's up to you if
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 11:11 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Sorry to add this only now, but I realized the failure is only
> reproducible if I run the testsuite with "make -j", as in "make -j8
> check; and even in that case, the failure is racy. With a bare "make
> check", things work for me as
One thing that's worth thinking about in advance about the load directive
is whether there needs to be a way to pass parameters into modules.
In my case I need for the module to be able to know whether it's allowed to
generate debug output or not. I can think of many other areas in which I
might
Hi Paul.
On 05/05/2013 08:19 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 00:44 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> The test 'features/output-sync' now fails for me:
>>
>> Test timed out after 6 seconds
>> Error running /storage/home/stefano/src/gnu/make/tests/../make \
>> (expected 0; got
