Re: [PATCH] Port functions/shell to Solaris 10

2019-10-11 Thread Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports and discussion for GNU make
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:25 PM Paul Eggert wrote: > One possibility is that the version of Perl shipped with Solaris is so old > that it predates this Perl standardization. It is a bit of a mess. Actually this patch fixes the same issue on aix with perl-5.10.1 regards, Dmitry

Re: [PATCH] Port functions/shell to Solaris 10

2019-10-11 Thread Paul Eggert
On 10/10/19 3:28 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Perhaps Perl on Solaris does some magic to convert this non-standard behavior into standard behavior. Yes, I think it's something along those lines. POSIX doesn't specify how signal numbers and exit statuses are shoehorned into the 'int' status updated

[bug #57022] Error 127 executing a script with no #!

2019-10-11 Thread Martin Dorey
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #57022 (project make): Argh, all those hours fighting autoconf to now see Dmitry had already sent a similar patch. I see Paul didn't like the cross-compilation issue. That was when it just looked like an ENOENT problem, which he could sensibly solve at runtime, before