Re: bug report

2021-03-03 Thread Philip Guenther
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:00 PM Goran V. wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2021, 15:41 -0500 schrieb Paul Smith: > > If by "a feature like that" you mean a way to create multiple pattern > > rules with a single rule definition in the makefile, then obviously > > this would require some new syntax

[bug #60165] Multiple pattern rules with single rule

2021-03-03 Thread anonymous
URL: Summary: Multiple pattern rules with single rule Project: make Submitted by: None Submitted on: Wed 03 Mar 2021 09:24:53 PM UTC Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group:

Re: bug report

2021-03-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 22:00 +0100, Goran V. wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2021, 15:41 -0500 schrieb Paul Smith: > Yes, that is what I mean with "a feature like that". But I must say > that I'm in no position to propose a patch as make is huge, > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/tree/ .

Re: bug report

2021-03-03 Thread Goran V.
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2021, 15:41 -0500 schrieb Paul Smith: > If by "a feature like that" you mean a way to create multiple pattern > rules with a single rule definition in the makefile, then obviously > this would require some new syntax but assuming that syntax existed I > don't see why it

Re: bug report

2021-03-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:32 +0100, Goran V. wrote: > Maybe I was wrong to call this a bug but would a feature like that > break anything? If by "a feature like that" you mean a way to create multiple pattern rules with a single rule definition in the makefile, then obviously this would require

Re: bug report

2021-03-03 Thread Goran V.
Maybe I was wrong to call this a bug but would a feature like that break anything? Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2021, 13:55 -0500 schrieb Paul Smith: > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 17:31 +0100, Goran V. wrote: > > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.html \ > > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.js \ > > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.css

Re: [PATCH] More correctly describe the scope of variables

2021-03-03 Thread Jouke Witteveen
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:37 AM Jouke Witteveen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 7:00 PM Jouke Witteveen wrote: > > > > * NEWS: Use "local" instead of the incorrect "lexically-scoped". > > * doc/make.texi: Refer to let/foreach variables as local variables. > > --- > > This is an erratum on the

Re: bug report

2021-03-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 17:31 +0100, Goran V. wrote: > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.html \ > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.js \ > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.css \ > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.svg \ > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.ico: > @echo -n "$(FRONTEND) - building $@" > @$(MD) $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND) >

bug report

2021-03-03 Thread Goran V.
I wrote a makefile with $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.html \ $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.js \ $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.css \ $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.svg \ $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.ico: @echo -n "$(FRONTEND) - building $@" @$(MD) $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND) @cp $(FRONTEND)/$(@F) $@