[bug #61885] How do I contribute to make? The submit new Patch link is crossed out?

2022-01-20 Thread igor.todorovski
URL: Summary: How do I contribute to make? The submit new Patch link is crossed out? Project: make Submitted by: igortodorovski Submitted on: Thu 20 Jan 2022 11:01:37 PM UTC

[bug #61885] How do I contribute to make? The submit new Patch link is crossed out?

2022-01-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #61885 (project make): It got too confusing to have multiple places for people to be supplying changes so I reduced them down to one: the bug tracker, and turned off the other features like patches. If you have changes you'd like to see please create patches and either

Re: $(info xxx) output interleaved with other $(info) output

2022-01-20 Thread Dmitry Goncharov
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 5:41 PM Paul Eggert wrote: > I suggested working around the problem in the GNU Emacs Makefiles by > installing the attached patch. It's a bit of a hack but I couldn't think > of anything better, other than outputting the information with the shell > rather than with

[bug #61885] How do I contribute to make? The submit new Patch link is crossed out?

2022-01-20 Thread igor.todorovski
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #61885 (project make): Also, is there a CI/CD pipeline for regression testing and if so, how does one add their own machine to it? ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: $(info xxx) output interleaved with other $(info) output

2022-01-20 Thread Paul Eggert
On 1/19/22 23:11, Paul Smith wrote: I rewrote this function and applied this change: Oh, that's much nicer than what I sent! Thanks. I suggested working around the problem in the GNU Emacs Makefiles by installing the attached patch. It's a bit of a hack but I couldn't think of anything

[bug #48643] Irrelevant targets can confuse make on which pattern rule to select.

2022-01-20 Thread Dmitry Goncharov
Follow-up Comment #35, bug #48643 (project make): > Do you mean that if I apply the test patch mentioned there, some of those tests would fail? All tests should pass. in the case of example 6 make fails to set pat->is_explicit for 'hello.x'. This used to fail example 6 until commit 6682fb. My

[bug #48643] Irrelevant targets can confuse make on which pattern rule to select.

2022-01-20 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #34, bug #48643 (project make): I didn't fully grasp the impact of the issue you raised in comment #31. Do you mean that if I apply the test patch mentioned there, some of those tests would fail? I will try to look at this more this evening. Regarding your question in comment

[bug #48643] Irrelevant targets can confuse make on which pattern rule to select.

2022-01-20 Thread Dmitry Goncharov
Follow-up Comment #33, bug #48643 (project make): This fix turned out to be difficult. i'll be surprised if we don't miss anything. i wanted to bring to your attention a couple of leftovers. One is that pat->is_explicit that is described in update 31. For the other let's consider example 8.