Re: new feature idea: ingesting processed rulesets

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:07 AM Zoltán Turányi wrote: > If we invoke make on the top makefile, it will compile the two lib{1,2}.o > object files serially. That's because your rule is subs: cd sub1 make cd ../sub2 make Do something

[bug #64185] *** only one 'else' per conditional. Stop. due to else in recipe

Follow-up Comment #11, bug #64185 (project make): > If someone has a thought of something this might break (other than people indenting their conditionals with the recipe prefix) please let me know See https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?64259

[bug #64259] Regression in master: make ignores statements it should not ignore.

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #64259 (project make): Commit 07fcee35f058a876447c8a021f9eb1943f902534 introduced a regression. The text in NEWS clarifies that the idea was to never consider a line starting with the recipe prefix as a conditional, to ensure make does not confuse recipe lines with

[bug #64259] Regression in master: make ignores statements it should not ignore.

Additional Item Attachment, bug #64259 (project make): File name: sv64259_fix.diff Size:2 KB File name: sv64259_test.diff Size:1 KB

[bug #64259] Regression in master: make ignores statements it should not ignore.

URL: Summary: Regression in master: make ignores statements it should not ignore. Group: make Submitter: dgoncharov Submitted: Sat 27 May 2023 03:33:14 PM UTC Severity: 3 -