On Monday, January 29, 2024 5:18 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>rsbec...@nexbridge.com (27 January 2024 23:45) wrote:
>> My take on it is that +:= (because of the : ) means that you have to
resolve
>everything at that point.
>
>Surely it could equally mean: fully expand the right-hand side immediatel
rsbec...@nexbridge.com (27 January 2024 23:45) wrote:
> My take on it is that +:= (because of the : ) means that you have to resolve
> everything at that point.
Surely it could equally mean: fully expand the right-hand side
immediately, append to the left-hand variable, preserving its type if
se
Paul Smith (27 January 2024 21:32) wrote:
> I'm interested in peoples' opinions about which of these two
> implementations they would feel to be more "intuitive" or "correct".
> Also please consider issues of "action at a distance" where a variable
> is assigned in one makefile and appended to in s
