On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 02:13:36 +0100
Matt Staveley-Taylor wrote:
> Browsing the mailing list I can see that the behaviour of -j with no
> arguments has been discussed a few times. Given it would affect
> backwards compatability to change how -j works, introducing a new
> flag seems appropriate.
Add the -J/--detect-job-slots flag as an shorthand equivalent for
-j$(nproc). The help message is deliberately left ambiguous so that we
could change it to nproc + 1 in future, if desired.
Signed-off-by: Matt Staveley-Taylor
---
Browsing the mailing list I can see that the behaviour of -j with
