Follow-up Comment #2, bug #42599 (project make):
Yeah, I realized later that there is an ambiguity problem. The obvious answer
is to allow the prefix char if it is preceded by exactly the same whitespace
as the rule line.
I think that's worthwhile.
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42599
Summary: .RECIPEPREFIX should not have to be at beginning of
line
Project: make
Submitted by: yost
Submitted on: Sun 22 Jun 2014 01:40:54 PM PDT
Severity: 3 - Normal
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42288
Summary: limit parallelism based on available memory
Project: make
Submitted by: yost
Submitted on: Sun 04 May 2014 03:03:17 PM PDT
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group:
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42289
Summary: .NOTPARALLEL should be allowed to have prerequisites
Project: make
Submitted by: yost
Submitted on: Sun 04 May 2014 03:11:46 PM PDT
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #8297 (project make):
At the very least, the documentation needs to be revised to discuss the
situation of multiple targets being produced by a rule action and to offer the
pattern workaround.
___
Reply to this
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #24723 (project make):
I should have said
Make should have a syntax to express that all targets of a multiple-results
rule are created as a group by a single execution of the command(s).
___
Reply to this item
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?24723
Summary: multiple results created as a group
Project: make
Submitted by: yost
Submitted on: Sat 01 Nov 2008 03:50:51 PM PDT
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group:
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #17873 (project make):
This proposal allows us to use make -j not only without worry but also with
as much concurrency as possible, on any of a set of makefiles that have been
appropriately annotated.
BTW, the doc section is:
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #17873 (project make):
Clarification:
If .NOTPARALLEL is mentioned as a prerequisite .. built serially in the order
given, even if ...
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?17873
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?17880
Summary: Manual needs example for order-only prerequisites
Project: make
Submitted by: yost
Submitted on: Thursday 09/28/2006 at 13:05
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #17873 (project make):
Similar to bug #5108
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?17873
___
Message sent via/by Savannah
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?17873
Summary: .NOTPARALLEL enhancements
Project: make
Submitted by: yost
Submitted on: Wednesday 09/27/2006 at 18:25
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: Enhancement
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #17701 (project make):
The sentence in question should be moved to 5.4, and the .NOTPARALLEL entry
should direct the reader there. See also bug #17873 .PARALLEL
enhancements.
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #9062 (project make):
A reminder: this bug is a request for a variable whose value is the full path
of the directory containing the Makefile, regardless of what the current
directory is or how it got that way with -C, etc.
There has been much discussion of the current
Consider a Makefile that starts thus:
include ../../../Makefile-master
It would be nice if this included Makefile-master knew where it was, so it could do
stuff like this:
root := $(MAKEFILE-PARENT-DIR)
classesDir := $(root)/classes
I use this unsatisfactory workaround:
It would be nice to be able to invoke make so it dumps out the Makefile as it will
run, after includes, and optionally, with all variables expanded that can be expanded
statically.
Thanks
Dave
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This Makefile
define foo
endef
oops
complains that the oops is missing a separator. Fine so far, but it reports the line
number as 2 instead of 3.
gmake is otherwise awesome!
Thanks
Dave
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have two sets of isomorphic sources. Let's say one is in lisp syntax and the other
is in Java syntax. Two different sets of programmers, one likes lisp syntax; the
other likes Java syntax.
I've written a program that automatically syncs the two sets of files, but I can't get
make to invoke
It would be nice to be able to turn on this feature from within a Makefile.
Thanks
Dave
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
19 matches
Mail list logo