Sviđa mi se!
--
Kevin R. Bulgrien
- Original Message -
> From: "Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports and discussion for GNU make"
>
> To: "Bartol Hrg"
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 12:25:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Make language
> I plan to bow out of this discussion as I'm not vested in it, but, a
> distinguishing significant functional or interpretive difference
> between these two forms is not self-evident:
>
> 1)
>
>FILE_SIZES := 5 2 1 4
>TOTAL :- $(math +, $(FILE_SIZES))
>
> 2)
>
> FILE_SIZES := 5 2 1 4
> There's something to be said for this being able potentially to work
> - not that I'm pushing it mind:
> FILE_SIZES:= 5 2 1 4
> TOTAL:=$(+ $(FILE_SIZES)) # TOTAL is 5+2+1+4
> Here I'm not objecting to ($math +,$(FILE_SIZES)) or $(op
> +,$(FILE_SIZES)) - whatever on them - I am only trying to
> Of course we can still do prefix notation with a single function we
> just have to choose a name for it and it's a little less slick; for
> example something like:
>
> $(op + 5 7 $(op * 3 2) 9)
>
> or whatever so the function is named "op" (for example). Or it could
> be named something
rce change required to make build on this platform
possible. I realize that this particular platform is far outside of
vendor support, but don't really see the need to go through all that
again, but at least, I figured I'd throw this on the list if only to
archive the finding.
Regards,
Kevin R. Bulgrien
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
