Re: CVS psmith make: Whoops; configure wasn't looking for memmove.

2002-09-10 Thread Soren A
sing GNU make. I do understand all this about the portability issues and bootstrapping and all. I'd personally just rather not have to think at all about it. You, I know, don't have that luxury ;-). Soren A ___ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Re: CVS psmith make: Whoops; configure wasn't looking for memmove.

2002-09-10 Thread Soren A
I am freed from the vile wilderness of Confusion at last ... "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > %% Soren A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I don't understand this. If bcopy() isn&

Re: CVS psmith make: Whoops; configure wasn't looking for memmove.

2002-09-09 Thread Soren A
"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > %% Soren A writes: > > sa> Yes, and because of that, build on Win32-ish was failing; but > also sa> you need to have configure check for bcopy(), because

Re: CVS psmith make: Whoops; configure wasn't looking for memmove.

2002-09-09 Thread Soren A
*I* Soren A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > A part of needs to be rewritten because it appears that at > some point an ad-hoc (?) addition was made to try to deal with lack of > bcopy(), but was done not properly, by get

Re: CVS psmith make: Whoops; configure wasn't looking for memmove.

2002-09-09 Thread Soren A
line number. Unpacking and viewing the diff at the url (below) would yield the approximate location of the part I am talking about (approximate because the diff is against patched rc1 source, not current CVS source). My sitelet at http://home.att.net/~perlspinr/build_platforms/mingw-make/#c_i trie

Re: Built make-3.80rc1 on MinGW/MSYS - brief

2002-09-03 Thread Soren A
keep my results minimally organized and accessible to myself. Best, Soren A ___ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Re: Built make-3.80rc1 on MinGW/MSYS - brief

2002-09-03 Thread Soren A
thod / charset thing happening right not to let me type that ;-). Regards, Soren A ___ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Re: Built make-3.80rc1 on Cygwin - brief

2002-09-03 Thread Soren A
"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I encourage anyone who has the time and energy to put into improving the > test suite to do so. Please let me know so we can discuss it. Thanks for the reply and the invitation. Alas right now I personal

Built make-3.80rc1 on MinGW/MSYS - brief

2002-09-02 Thread Soren A
Hello, I want to let people who might care know that I've built 'make' 3.80rc1 from patched source on MinGW in msys. I didn't use CVS source (which probably should be done, as filing reports to GNU make's maintainer, Paul D. Smith, should probably be done too) but instead used source obtained v