[bug #16053] second stem overwrites the first per-prerequisite stem

2006-03-17 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Update of bug #16053 (project make): Status:None => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Fixed Release:None => CVS

[bug #16053] second stem overwrites the first per-prerequisite stem

2006-03-16 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Update of bug #16053 (project make): Assigned to:None => bosk ___ Follow-up Comment #3: I would rather fix it properly right away than to come back to it. Will try to fix it before the e

[bug #16053] second stem overwrites the first per-prerequisite stem

2006-03-15 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16053 (project make): Hm. I don't know if we can release 3.81 with this kind of regression: it's different than releasing with a bug in new behavior or with an old bug not fixed. Another idea which would resolve this problem but not the general case (when .SECONDARYEX

[bug #16053] second stem overwrites the first per-prerequisite stem

2006-03-15 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #16053 (project make): Attaching a minimized test case. It prints "all.foo.one all.foo.two" while should print "all.one all.foo.two". I also checked the code and it seems that keeping stem in prerequisites is the best way to solve this. I am not sure, however, if we sho

[bug #16053] second stem overwrites the first per-prerequisite stem

2006-03-10 Thread anonymous
URL: Summary: second stem overwrites the first per-prerequisite stem Project: make Submitted by: None Submitted on: Fri 03/10/06 at 08:57 Severity: 3 - Normal