From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:15:09 -0400
I think it pseudo-code it would look something like this:
if (posix-shell)
{
...strip out @-+ from LINE...
}
#ifdef WINDOWS32
if (need a batch file)
{
...write
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:37:29 -0400
My plan was to write dlopen and dlsym, and add them to
w32/compat/posixfcn.c. But I need to understand the semantics of
global_dl in order to do that correctly.
It's up to you how you think it
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:58:54 -0400
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
That would be nice, indeed.
OK, pushed. You should be able to simply write a new load_objects()
function and drop it in. Or put it into a
Sorry to keep adding in my 2c but I have also submitted a plugin
implementation so I have a couple of ideas
On 29 April 2013 17:33, Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org wrote:
2. The fact that the dynamic object's file extension (.so) is exposed
to the Makefile is unfortunate, because it will hurt
I must clarify - I think that make should provide plugins with an
allocation mechanism. Not the other way around.
the snprintf model for dealing with expansion is not so bad - I mean the
problem is that nobody knows how big an expansion is going to be in the
end, right? So how does make deal
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:19:09 +0100
From: Tim Murphy tnmur...@gmail.com
Cc: Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org bug-make@gnu.org
2. The fact that the dynamic object's file extension (.so) is exposed
to the Makefile is unfortunate, because it will hurt portability of
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:59:16 -0400
1. Doesn't the FSF frown upon capability to load _any_ dynamic
objects? I think they like the GCC method whereby each extension
is required to define a symbol with a certain name
On 29 April 2013 20:12, Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:19:09 +0100
From: Tim Murphy tnmur...@gmail.com
Cc: Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
bug-make@gnu.org
2. The fact that the dynamic object's file extension (.so) is exposed
to the
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:40:46 +0100
From: Tim Murphy tnmur...@gmail.com
Cc: Paul D. Smith psm...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org bug-make@gnu.org
How can one deal with them? The underlying OS is not easily
detectable by Make.
the same way one creates 1 makefile that can build the same
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:34:51 +0300
From: Eli Zaretskii e...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Also we don't really have a precedent of a make-specific directory
like that.
Gawk puts them into ${prefix}/lib/gawk.
Correction: ${prefix}/lib/gawk-extensions.
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:58:54 -0400
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
That would be nice, indeed.
OK, pushed.
Thanks! But I see you kept global_dl and the call to dlopen with the
1st argument NULL. What is
From: Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.net
Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:54:10 -0400
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
The .ONESHELL feature is now supported on MS-Windows, for the default
Windows shell (cmd.exe) or compatible
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 20:19 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:58:54 -0400
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
That would be nice, indeed.
OK, pushed.
Thanks! But I see you kept
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 21:14 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.net
Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:54:10 -0400
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
The .ONESHELL feature is now supported on MS-Windows,
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:37:29 -0400
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 20:19 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:58:54 -0400
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:15:09 -0400
The goal of this code in the if-statement is to implement a special case
allowing ONESHELL to be easier to add in the case where you DO have a
standard shell. In that case, and ONLY in that case, we
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 22:41 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I think the implementation you have is not quite right. I think the
parsing of the @-+ stuff is common across all platforms if we have a
shell, so you don't need the else /* non-posix shell */.
I do need a separate code, because it
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:01:05 -0400
I guess I thought you were writing a batch file,
then invoking the shell with the batch file name as the command to run.
E.g., command.com batchfile vs. perl batchfile etc. I am naive
but it seems
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:09:51 +0100
From: Anjum Naseer a.nas...@resilientplc.com
I have built the 3.82 version of GNU Make using the Microsoft Visual C++
compiler and it seems to work fine.
However, I cannot get it to work correctly with the .ONESHELL option.
I created a dummy makefile
From: Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.net
Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:54:10 -0400
Also, I wonder if you have a few minutes to go through the open Windows
bugs in Savannah and make a comment or whatever to those which are still
waiting (some are waiting
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 20:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Note: there's one more major feature in current git repo that needs to
be made available on Windows: dynamic loading of extensions. That is
my highest priority for Make todo list.
Yes. I wonder if there are features of gnulib which make
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: make-...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:28:18 -0400
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 20:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Note: there's one more major feature in current git repo that needs to
be made available on Windows: dynamic loading of
I took with make-w32 list off.
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 22:18 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I added a similar facility to Gawk, but there a problem was much
simpler, because Gawk itself was tracking the loaded extensions in
platform-independent code. So my emulation of dlopen didn't need to
From: Paul Smith psm...@gnu.org
Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:32:22 -0400
Well, we already maintain a list of modules that are loaded in
the .LOADED variable. Although it's not written like that today, I have
no problem changing the code to check that variable to see
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 23:00 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
That would be nice, indeed.
OK, pushed. You should be able to simply write a new load_objects()
function and drop it in. Or put it into a w32 file or whatever.
___
Bug-make mailing list
25 matches
Mail list logo
