I am freed from the vile wilderness of Confusion at last ...
Paul D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
%% Soren A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand this. If bcopy() isn't there and memmove() is
(which wasn't being checked but now
Paul D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The whole entire point of using automake is to allow packages to ship
with makefiles that are 100% portable without having to go through all
the effort to write them--which is considerable if you don't use
%% Soren A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sa Yes, and because of that, build on Win32-ish was failing; but also
sa you need to have configure check for bcopy(), because bcopy()
sa isn't there on Win32- Gnu-ish platforms (I have been told it is
sa part of GlibC, but Cygwin, etc are based on
%% Soren A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand this. If bcopy() isn't there and memmove() is
(which wasn't being checked but now will be) then the code in make.h
as-is works.
Doesn't it?
sa It really doesn't. [...]
Please note my parenthetical statement (also the
