> From: Budi
> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:13:50 +0700
>
> On Windows msys: this 'make' is ported to be 'make.exe' in msys package,
> isn't it? I come accross a problem as I used to build using this
> make.exe. Then I installed msys2 (64 bit version of msys) and build by
> the same name but miss
On Windows msys: this 'make' is ported to be 'make.exe' in msys package,
isn't it? I come accross a problem as I used to build using this
make.exe. Then I installed msys2 (64 bit version of msys) and build by
the same name but missing it, in short, I was wondering why there's been
no 64 bit mak
I was able to get one type of archive rules working for VMS, but have
not been able to figure how to translate code from the makefiles into
the internal default pattern rules for a more general case.
The rule below works for object libraries suffixes ".a" and ".olb" only.
For VMS I have to us
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:08:06 +0400
> From: "Dmitry V. Levin"
>
> gnulib has a nproc module that can "detect the number of processors":
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/modules/nproc
> Judging from the number of #if's in its implementation it must be quite
> portable. :)
Bu
> From: Paul Smith
> Cc: warner.w...@hp.com, Bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:35:18 -0500
>
> On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Does it even make sense to use -j with no arguments? Should we
> > perhaps remove that possibility, or have some internal sane lim
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 09:35:18AM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Does it even make sense to use -j with no arguments? Should we
> > perhaps remove that possibility, or have some internal sane limit,
> > like twice the number of cores, say?
>
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Does it even make sense to use -j with no arguments? Should we
> perhaps remove that possibility, or have some internal sane limit,
> like twice the number of cores, say?
In general I'd say no, the current behavior is not ideal. However I
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:37:54 +0400
> From: "Dmitry V. Levin"
>
> > > make: More parallel jobs (-jN) than this platform can handle
> > > requested.
> > > make: Resetting to single job (-j1) mode.
> >
> > I see no message like this in the current Make sources. Maybe I'm
> > missing
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:50:17PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: "Wang, Warner"
> > CC: "Bug-make@gnu.org"
> > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:42:04 +
> >
> > btw there is an internal limit, which is 4096 jobs, either on my mainframe
> > or PC. If I use "-j 4097" it will complain:
> >
> From: "Wang, Warner"
> CC: "Bug-make@gnu.org"
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:42:04 +
>
> btw there is an internal limit, which is 4096 jobs, either on my mainframe or
> PC. If I use "-j 4097" it will complain:
> [root@lion linux-3.3.0-0.20.el7]# make -j 4097
> make: More parallel jo
ssage-
From: Eli Zaretskii [mailto:e...@gnu.org]
Sent: 2012年12月14日 PM 11:07
To: psm...@gnu.org
Cc: Wang, Warner; Bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung
easily.
> From: Paul Smith
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:59:31 -0500
> From: Paul Smith
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:59:31 -0500
> Cc: "Bug-make@gnu.org"
>
> This basically says that if you use "-j" with no arguments, make will
> run as many jobs as the _makefile_ allows (defined by your prerequisite
> rules). It pays no attention to the limits of your system.
>
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:45 +, Wang, Warner wrote:
> Hello everyone, make experts,
>
> when I use "make -j" (without specifying a number after it) to compile
> Linux kernel, it will always make my machine hung, get no response at
> all and the kernel's watchdog (khungtaskd) will complain beca
Hello everyone, make experts,
when I use "make -j" (without specifying a number after it) to compile Linux
kernel, it will always make my machine hung, get no response at all and the
kernel's watchdog (khungtaskd) will complain because there are processes in
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE status for 120
souvik sadhu
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 23:12
To: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Need Help
Hi..
Give me the steps for execution of make.
Suppose i have 3 .c and 1 .h file. what should i do to make a make file.
I m using gcc compiler.
Just write the code with any rule and dependenvy.(as u wa
Hi..
Give me the steps for execution of make.
Suppose i have 3 .c and 1 .h file. what should i do to make a make file.
I m using gcc compiler.
Just write the code with any rule and dependenvy.(as u want)
and after this what i have to do to produce a make file.
tell me the command by which
This is a problem with your code or invocation of your compiler.
This mailing list is for help with GNU make; this problem is not related
to make itself or how to write makefiles, so we can't help you.
You should find a list that deals with your compiler, or else examine
the documentation or ask
Hi,
We are using gmake to compile our project. I am facing
problem to include local files.
I have about 10 .h files in /sw/rebuild/Central/Release/m1000/kgem/inc directory
which is common place for all engineers
I brought over ksvid.h file to my local
workspace(/export/home1/rajanit
> Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> BTW, while Eli Zaretskii is still providing excellent support for the
> DOS port of GNU make, it would be great if we had a few more pretesters
> for this port, as well.
I second this. (By "the DOS port
EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 4:18 PM
Subject: Need help with Windows port for GNU make (+ DOS pretesters)
> Hi all.
>
> Recently Rob Tulloh has notified me that he's no longer able to give th
Hi all.
Recently Rob Tulloh has notified me that he's no longer able to give the
maintenance of the Windows port of GNU make the attention he would like,
due to other demands on his time. I would like to publicly thank him
for his many years of dedication to and support of that effort, and I
hop
21 matches
Mail list logo
