Thanks for the prompt reply.
I rewrote the targets with the pattern rules as you
suggested, and it now works fine.
Still not sure why that the behaviour I saw had the
"sleep" dependency though. Even given that the rule I wrote
was essentially two separate rules, I would have expected
the visit
%% Tommy Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tk> I'm seeing an intermittent (i.e. two consecutive invocations
tk> can be different) results when I have a command which
tk> produces two targets. It occurs when both targets are
tk> themselves given as dependencies of the same higher target.
