%% "Darren Hiebert (Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
dh> As recorded in this message:
dh> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2005-02/msg00012.html
dh> On 16 Feb 2005, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>> The time has come, and past, to get GNU make 3.81 out the door. Here is
>>
As recorded in this message:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2005-02/msg00012.html
On 16 Feb 2005, Paul D. Smith wrote:
The time has come, and past, to get GNU make 3.81 out the door. Here is
the schedule I am committing to: there WILL be a release of GNU make
3.81 on or about M
> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:37:38 -0500
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, make-w32@gnu.org
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ez> file.c: In function `file_timestamp_cons':
> ez> file.c:554: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range
> of data type
>
> Unfortunately there
%% "Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:45:41 -0500
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.bz2
>> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.gz
ez> Here's an annoyance with this beta version when I b
> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:45:41 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.bz2
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.gz
Here's an annoyance with this beta version when I build it with DJGPP
and GCC 3.3.3 or 3.4.3:
gcc -I. -I. -I.
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:42:42 -0500
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ez> 5. On variable.c, the function define_automatic_variables used to
> ez>always export SHELL (there was a line "v->export = v_export;" right
> ez>after SHELL was assigned
I noticed several files were not writable in the tar.gz package. Could
the files also be -wr- when it is the final release please?
Kind regards
JG
-r--r--r-- config.ami
-r--r--r-- configh.dos
-r--r--r-- config.h-vms
-r--r--r-- config.h.W32
-r--r--r-- Makefile.DOS
-r--r--r-- README
-r--r--r--
%% "Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ez> Thanks. I downloaded that and built the DJGPP (a.k.a. MS-DOS)
ez> port of this version of Make, and here are my findings.
Thanks Eli! I haven't looked at the patches, but just a comment:
ez> 5. On variable.c, the function define_automati
> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:45:41 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Today I am announcing the second beta release of GNU make 3.81. It's
> available from my web site, here:
>
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.bz2
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.gz
T
%% "Andreas M. Kirchwitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
amk> fubar:
amk> /bin/echo hello
amk> I've tested this on Solaris 10 3/05 (official release)
amk> on various SPARC, Intel and AMD systems.
amk> Solaris 10 doesn't seem to be very popular, but since
amk> /usr/sfw/bin/gmak
: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Schedule for GNU make 3.81
Hello Paul!
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.bz2
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.gz
>
> This release contains all current bug fixes and new features.
Thanks for this new version
I don't see the print-all-cmds patch
closed -- its still open at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=111
I did a similar patch several years ago...
Also, I posted a patch a number of years ago which echos the makefiles
which are read in (like the gcc -H option) -- I find th
Hello Paul!
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.bz2
> http://make.paulandlesley.org/make-3.81beta2.tar.gz
>
> This release contains all current bug fixes and new features.
Thanks for this new version and all the effort you put
into this software.
You may remember my p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all;
The time has come, and past, to get GNU make 3.81 out the door. Here is
the schedule I am committing to: there WILL be a release of GNU make
3.81 on or about March 1, 2005.
Today I am announcing the second beta release of GNU make 3.81.
14 matches
Mail list logo