Hi,
Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12 August 2007 15:07, Ludovic Courtes wrote:
Am I missing something
The fact that you already sent this yesterday and it already got answered
two hours before you resent it?
Indeed. :-)
Apologies for the noise.
(Actually, it took me a
Hi,
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule:
.SUFFIXES = .in
^ ^
I think, you mixed some syntax here. It's either
SUFFIXES = .in
for automake-processed
On 12 August 2007 15:07, Ludovic Courtes wrote:
Am I missing something
The fact that you already sent this yesterday and it already got answered
two hours before you resent it? Did the first answer fall in your spam bin
maybe?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline
Hi,
I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule:
.SUFFIXES = .in
.in:
echo dot-in
My understanding is that the rule should be triggered whenever there
exists a file whose name is equal to the target name plus the `.in'
suffix. For instance, make foo should trigger the
: Single-suffix rules broken?
Hi,
I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule:
.SUFFIXES = .in
.in:
echo dot-in
My understanding is that the rule should be triggered whenever there
exists a file whose name is equal to the target name plus the `.in'
suffix. For instance
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule:
.SUFFIXES = .in
^ ^
I think, you mixed some syntax here. It's either
SUFFIXES = .in
for automake-processed files or (and this is AFAIK created from the
above
