Re: VMS: Fix explicit rules for VMS

2014-10-19 Thread Paul Smith
I pushed these fixes. Note that I modified some of the patches slightly to fix up some coding standard issues, etc. You should rebase or merge your subsequent changes to the current master HEAD. On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 19:22 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: > On the archive patch, I forgot to add th

Re: VMS: Fix explicit rules for VMS

2014-10-17 Thread John E. Malmberg
On 10/17/2014 7:45 AM, Paul Smith wrote: On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 23:29 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: On 10/8/2014 10:14 PM, John E. Malmberg wrote: On 10/7/2014 11:43 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Some of the same formatting notes as before; please check your code against the style of the rest of the c

Re: VMS: Fix explicit rules for VMS

2014-10-17 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 23:29 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: > On 10/8/2014 10:14 PM, John E. Malmberg wrote: > > On 10/7/2014 11:43 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > >> Some of the same formatting notes as before; please check your code > >> against the style of the rest of the code. > > > > Reformatted patch

Re: VMS: Fix explicit rules for VMS

2014-10-16 Thread John E. Malmberg
On 10/8/2014 10:14 PM, John E. Malmberg wrote: On 10/7/2014 11:43 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Some of the same formatting notes as before; please check your code against the style of the rest of the code. Reformatted patch to GNU coding standard. Rebuilt to add a fix to remake.c to call gpath_sear

Re: VMS: Fix explicit rules for VMS

2014-10-08 Thread John E. Malmberg
On 10/7/2014 11:43 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Some of the same formatting notes as before; please check your code against the style of the rest of the code. Reformatted patch to GNU coding standard. Regards, -John >From 1260e3ae9c0725e3f8f7e7a790c9f5fcf67fbde6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John

Re: VMS: Fix explicit rules for VMS

2014-10-07 Thread Paul Smith
Some of the same formatting notes as before; please check your code against the style of the rest of the code. It seems picky and I can clean these up myself afterwards, but I don't know whether to do it in the same commit (which is weird since it will have two authors) or in a followup commit (wh

VMS: Fix explicit rules for VMS

2014-10-07 Thread John E. Malmberg
This patch fixes make on VMS to be able to run the se_implicit tests. 1. Add the missing default rules that were needed for the se_implicit tests to pass. 2. Remove the disabling of UNIX path parsing on VMS. 3. Fix some of the VMS path parsing. More work still needs to be done there, but th