RE: VMS port

2013-11-25 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! > Please leave DOS out of this discussion: it doesn't support parallel > execution (and never will), and therefore output-sync is a no-op there. Ah, sorry, of course. I forgot... :) Well, EMX then. And, anyway, i've refactored the thing a little bit more and now it doesn't introduce an

Re: VMS port

2013-11-25 Thread hb
may be this fragment should become > completely generic ? Just with some note that VMS code should also implement > handling for it. The VMS port does not support parallel execution of recipes. So the output-sync (although accepted) is ignored. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

Re: VMS port

2013-11-25 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Pavel Fedin > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:44:20 +0400 > Cc: bug-make@gnu.org > > Actually, i want to fix output-sync for spawn()-based flavor. This includes > EMX, DOS and potentially Cygwin. Currently output-sync option will not work > in that ports, because the related fragment: > ---

RE: VMS port

2013-11-25 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! > The VMS port is actively and capably maintained by Hartmut Becker. The > ChangeLog shows he provided VMS fixes for 4.0 as recently as September. Ah, i see. Thanks for pointing at. > It's easier if patches are targeted for specific results, so it's best >

Re: VMS port

2013-11-25 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 13:48 +0400, Pavel Fedin wrote: > I am restarting work on spawn-patch for Cygwin. Actually, i have the very > first version working, but want to try to do some face-lift and get rid of > some #ifdef's. > My first question is: is VMS port maintained, or dea

VMS port

2013-11-25 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! I am restarting work on spawn-patch for Cygwin. Actually, i have the very first version working, but want to try to do some face-lift and get rid of some #ifdef's. My first question is: is VMS port maintained, or dead long ago ? Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Sa

Re: Error in VMS port of GNU make

2001-04-24 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Michael Espe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: me> In file variable.c, the procedure lookup_variable has an error in the me> following code: me> if (listp) me> *listp = current_variable_set_list; me> The variable listp is not defined, nor is it really used, so it

Error in VMS port of GNU make

2001-04-24 Thread Michael Espe
In file variable.c, the procedure lookup_variable has an error in the following code: sptr = value; scnt = 0; if (listp) *listp = current_variable_set_list; while ((sptr = strchr (sptr, '$'))) { The variable listp is not defined, n

minor glitch in job.c for GNU make 3.79 VMS port

2000-05-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Here's a very minor code cleanup for GNU make. job.c includes time.h, but make.h already includes time.h, so this is redundant. 2000-05-22 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * job.c: Don't include time.h, as make.h already does this. =