On Wednesday 19 April 2006 08:18, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mf> so the question is, should gcc be making sure that the shell
> mf> scripts that use SHELL pull the value from configure ? or is make
> mf> broken ?
>
> Make is not broken: this behavi
%% Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mf> so the question is, should gcc be making sure that the shell
mf> scripts that use SHELL pull the value from configure ? or is make
mf> broken ?
Make is not broken: this behavior WRT SHELL is mandated by the POSIX
standard.
There are variou
On 4/18/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with the new handling of SHELL, gcc fails to build under non posix compatible
> shells (like tcsh) or if the env SHELL is set to a non-existant shell (think
> zsh on the host system and chrooting into a local filesystem and using
> bash ... ba
with the new handling of SHELL, gcc fails to build under non posix compatible
shells (like tcsh) or if the env SHELL is set to a non-existant shell (think
zsh on the host system and chrooting into a local filesystem and using
bash ... bash by design doesnt reset the SHELL=/bin/zsh value)
the bi
