Re: make and backslash-newline's

2006-01-03 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 02:37:03AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: I have some surprisingly good statistics. In ALT Linux Sisyphus (repository with 5000+ source packages) percentage of packages You have fallen for the trap [...] It's full name (ALT GNU/*/Linux Sisyphus) is too long to

Re: make and backslash-newline's

2006-01-02 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Alfred M\. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ps It's not clear to me what the problem is with having a late beta ps of GNU make installed into Debian unstable. If these changes are ps going to be in the next release would it really have made much ps difference to wait for that? ams

Re: make and backslash-newline's

2005-12-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Alfred M\. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ams Thanks for the detailed explanation, but the thing with the ams backslash/newline stuff is that it breaks old Makefiles, and it ams makes new Makefiles not work with old makes; it is also hard (and ams might make it even more unreadable

Re: make and backslash-newline's

2005-12-28 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
I still believe the change is localized and not widespread enough to justify supporting both behaviors... hopefully I'm not whistling past the graveyard. I don't know if I should take your word for it, or if I should compile lots of things (old and new) with the beta make and report what

Re: make and backslash-newline's

2005-12-28 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
I have some surprisingly good statistics. In ALT Linux Sisyphus (repository with 5000+ source packages) percentage of packages You have fallen for the trap that Linux is a operating system, which it is not; it is simply a kernel. The operating system you are actually refering to is an

Re: make and backslash-newline's

2005-12-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Alfred M\. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: pds I still believe the change is localized and not widespread enough pds to justify supporting both behaviors... hopefully I'm not pds whistling past the graveyard. ams I don't know if I should take your word for it, or if I should ams

Re: make and backslash-newline's

2005-12-28 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
It's not clear to me what the problem is with having a late beta of GNU make installed into Debian unstable. If these changes are going to be in the next release would it really have made much difference to wait for that? The problem is that you don't get the chance to read the NEWS

make and backslash-newline's

2005-12-25 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Hey, Please revert the POSIX_ME_HARDER change of backslash-newline sequences are handled. There is absolutley no reason to break this. Lots of old Makefile use it, and so do many new ones. If one wishes to follow POSIX, one can make this the default setting when POSIX_ME_HARDER (usually known