On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:46 AM Paul Smith wrote:
> Maybe if you described the thing you were trying to accomplish or
> understand, and what about the documentation made this difficult, we
> could come up with a practical example or improve the documentation.
Yes, I totally agree with you about
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 15:04 +0300, Dmitry wrote:
> > > It'll be very good to have some examples with explanations in the
> > > docs.
> > Maybe so. Concrete suggestions are easy to discuss, like:
>
> I think this example would saved me a lot of time.
>
> make -f mkfile
>
> content of mkfile:
>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:07 PM wrote:
> With all respect, yours is is a baseless complaint - please complain to your
> English teacher instead.
With all respect, why do you choose the most negligible subject and
show me your dominance, professor?
What about the other two complaints? Are they base
lar support added to the
> > default rules, in which case the documentation could mention SCCS and RCS
> > specifically without becoming a maintenance burden. Reading the original
> > discussion, though, perhaps the more useful clarification would have been
> > to make i
> make it explicit that Make has default, built-in make rules, the ones from
> https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Catalogue-of-Rules.
>
>
> From: Bug-make on behalf of
> Dmitry
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 09:5
om
https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Catalogue-of-Rules.
From: Bug-make on behalf of
Dmitry
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 09:51
To: bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: notes about make docs p 3.5
* EXTERNAL EMAIL *
Hello, I'm reading GNU mak
Hello, I'm reading GNU make docs and had troubles with understanding
paragraph 3.5 .
These are some problems which I encountered:
1) make starts with a clean slate-> make starts with a clean sTate
2) It was difficult to understand how make remade makefiles without examples.
There is discussion wh