Re: Texinfo 7.1.0.90 pretest results [mingw]

2024-06-17 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Bruno Haible > Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:24:12 +0200 > > For mingw, though, I'll stay with a native Windows perl. That's the point of > a native Windows build. Right. And you cannot really build the XS extensions with MinGW against a non-native Perl anyway.

Re: Texinfo 7.1.0.90 pretest results [mingw]

2024-06-17 Thread Bruno Haible
I wrote: > I'll use Cygwin's perl in the Cygwin builds now. Indeed, this fixed all the test failures on Cygwin! Thanks, Ken. Bruno

Re: Texinfo 7.1.0.90 pretest results [mingw]

2024-06-17 Thread Bruno Haible
Ken Brown wrote: > >>- On Cygwin and mingw, there are many test failures, some of which > >> look like CR-LF / LF mismatches. > > I just took a look at the log on Cygwin, and the cause appears to be > that Strawberry Perl is being used rather than Cygwin's Perl. Unless > the CI does so

Re: Texinfo 7.1.0.90 pretest results [mingw]

2024-06-17 Thread Ken Brown
On 6/17/2024 3:59 PM, Gavin Smith wrote: On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 03:58:08AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: Summarizing the results from [2]: - On Cygwin and mingw, there are many test failures, some of which look like CR-LF / LF mismatches. I just took a look at the log on Cygwin, and t

Re: Texinfo 7.1.0.90 pretest results [mingw]

2024-06-17 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 03:58:08AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Summarizing the results from [2]: > - On Cygwin and mingw, there are many test failures, some of which > look like CR-LF / LF mismatches. > > [2] https://github.com/gnu-texinfo/ci-check/actions/runs/9432971359 I was able to do

Re: Texinfo 7.1.0.90 pretest results [OpenBSD 7.5]

2024-06-17 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 08:06:53PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 11:40:15AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > > It may be an issue with perl not having the right directory in its search > > list (@INC). I will investigate more. > > I tried to fix one problem on the master branch (

Re: declaring function pointers with explicit prototypes for the info reader

2024-06-17 Thread Patrice Dumas
Hello, Here is a patch to use explicit prototypes for terminal functions hooks. Also use prototypes in pcterm.c instead of K&R declarations. It would be nice if somebody could test on MSDOS and MSWindow as the whole hooks system seems to me to be for those platforms. -- Pat diff --git a/ChangeL

Re: declaring function pointers with explicit prototypes for the info reader

2024-06-17 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 05:37:48PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 04:29:10PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In standalone info reader code in info/ most function pointers are > > declared as a generic function pointer VFunction *, defined in info.h as > > >