On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:34:02PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> > And not forget to pop it when leaving a footnote (l. 866) (and also
> > probably in l. 3314 though I don't really remember what it corresponds
> > to).
>
> l.3314 refers to the 'indent_menu_descriptions' function. I haven't
> popp
Thanks for the detailed commentary. An updated patch is below. A test
file is also attached.
> And not forget to pop it when leaving a footnote (l. 866) (and also
> probably in l. 3314 though I don't really remember what it corresponds
> to).
l.3314 refers to the 'indent_menu_descriptions' functi
I don't remember if nested @*ref are allowed,
Just on this minor point: they're not. makeinfo warns about them.
(Seems like it could jus as well be an error.)
nestref.tex:7: warning: @ref should not appear in @xref
nestref.tex:7: warning: @pxref should not appear in @xref
..
For the line:
@
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 02:42:56PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> > Possibly any xref command inside a multitable should be implicitly
> > handled as if enclosed in @w, to avoid the unable-to-find-the-reference
> > problem.
>
> Here's a possible f
Here's a possible fix.
Cool. I'm all for it, in principle, not that I have any particular
expertise in reviewing it. Barring comments from Patrice, might as well
try it (plus doc + test?)?
BTW, something strange went wrong in the email formatting as sent (I guess):
+if (grep {$_->{
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> Possibly any xref command inside a multitable should be implicitly
> handled as if enclosed in @w, to avoid the unable-to-find-the-reference
> problem.
Here's a possible fix.
Index: Plaintext.pm
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> I notice that @w can block newlines.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> The purpose of @w{...} is to have absolutely no line breaks in the
> argument. The bug I see in your sample output is that @w{@ref{...}}
> does still allow a line brea
I notice that @w can block newlines.
I'm not sure what you mean.
The purpose of @w{...} is to have absolutely no line breaks in the
argument. The bug I see in your sample output is that @w{@ref{...}}
does still allow a line break at the space after the "*note". It seems
to me that should n
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gavin Smith wrote:
>> If makeinfo produces a cross-reference in a table in the Info output
>> and the text for the cross-reference is split across lines, then it is
>> not possible to follow the cross-reference.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gavin Smith wrote:
> If makeinfo produces a cross-reference in a table in the Info output
> and the text for the cross-reference is split across lines, then it is
> not possible to follow the cross-reference.
I should note that this is a problem with the new texind
If makeinfo produces a cross-reference in a table in the Info output
and the text for the cross-reference is split across lines, then it is
not possible to follow the cross-reference. For example:
Chunk nameFirst definition point
11 matches
Mail list logo
