Any comments on this?.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sasikantha babu
wrote:
> Fix of defect 33838 - https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33838
>
> OutPut Logs
> --
>
> [root@Shash wget]#
> [root@Shash wget]# ./src/wget
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/wget/wget-1.5.3.tar.gz --progress=dot -q
>
>
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Sasikanth babu writes:
>
> > +/lib/.deps/
> > +/lib/.gitignore
> > +/lib/Makefile
> > +/lib/Makefile.in
> > +/lib/arg-nonnull.h
> > +/lib/arpa/
> > +/lib/asnprintf.o
> > +/lib/
Attached patch
Thanks
Sasi
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sasikantha babu
wrote:
> Fix of defect 33838 - https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33838
>
> OutPut Logs
> --
>
> [root@Shash wget]#
> [root@Shash wget]# ./src/wget
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/wget/wget-1.5.3.tar.gz --progress=dot -q
>
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Ray Satiro wrote:
> >
> > From: Sasikanth babu
>
> >+/lib/dirname-lgpl.o
> >+/lib/dup-safer-flag.o
> >+/lib/dup-safer.o
> >+/lib/exitfail.o
> >+/lib/fatal-signal.o
> >+/lib/f
git status shows all .os and generated files as Untracked files, Added all
those list to
.gitignore
Signed-off-by: Sasikantha babu
---
.gitignore | 262
1 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 .gitignore
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Ángel González wrote:
> On 23/04/12 19:15, Sasikanth babu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am working on the bug "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33838"; - A
> way to
> > turn off verbosity but still have a progress bar.
&
Hi all,
I am working on the bug "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33838"; - A way to
turn off verbosity but still have a progress bar.
I think most of normal users may be interested about this
Proposed Solutions:
1) Show progress bar alone with this combination "--progress=XXX -q
--no-ver
Modified the calc_rate function to calculate bandwidth in powers of ten
(SI-prefix format)
for --bits option.
Please review the changes
Thanks
Sasi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sasikanth
Date: Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] [wget-bug
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Sasikanth writes:
>
> > No one asked. i had just thought it will be good to display all the
> output
> > in either bits or bytes to avoid confusion to the user (I had
> > confused).
>
> I underst
I modified the patch to display bandwidth in bits for --bits option not the
length.
I attached change log and diff file
Thanks
Sasi
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Sasikanth wrote:
> No one asked. i had just thought it will be good to display all the output
> in either bits or bytes to
No one asked. i had just thought it will be good to display all the output
in either bits or bytes to avoid confusion to the user (I had confused).
Anyhow thanks I will modify the patch.
Thanks
Sasi
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Sasikanth writes:
>
> >
I can fix before apply it,
> the patch seems ok.
>
> Before I can apply it though, you need to get copyright assignments with
> the FSF. I am going to send more information in private to you.
>
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
>
>
>
> Sasikanth writes:
>
> > Sorry
Sorry guys In my previous mail I attached .patch extension file instead of
.txt extension.
Now correctly attached
Thanks
Sasi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sasikanth
Date: Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:18 PM
Subject: [PATCH] [wget-bug #33210], Add an option to output bandwidth in
bits
Hi all,
I added a new option --bits as requested in
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33210.
This patch will display all data length in bits format for --bits option.
I had verified it with http and ftp. Please let me know If I missed out
anything.
Attachments: patch and change log ent
> the corrected version?
>
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
>
>
>
> Sasikanth writes:
>
> > I fixed the other message too.
> >
> > Change log entry (The diff also have the change log entry)
> >
> > 2012-01-9 Sasikantha babu
> > *
Log file entry?
>
> Cheers,
> Giuseppe
>
>
>
> Sasikanth writes:
>
> > I had modified the patch as you guys suggested.
> > For ipv6 the display will be [ipv6address]:port
> > for ipv4 ipv4address:port
> >
> > The test results
> >
> &g
27;t ambiguous in the way ipv6 is).
>>
>> (Sent by my Kindle Fire)
>> -mjc
>> Sent from my Kindle Fire
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Sasikanth
>> *Sent:* Fri Jan 06 01:56:34 PST 2012
>> *To:* henrik.ho...@millistream.com
>&g
k the discussion I
had copied the mail content from the mailing list.
Shouldn't IPv6 addresses be displayed like this instead:
[3ffe:b80:17e2::1]:80
/hh
Den 5 jan 2012 14:15 skrev "Sasikanth" :
> Hi,
>
> This very small change related to display issue.
> The bug id is
Hi,
This very small change related to display issue.
The bug id is 32357 "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?32357";
When we run wget with an ip address alone (wget 10.0.0.1 or wget
http://10.0.0.1/ or wget http://[3ffe:b80:17e2::1])
the display shows as
IPV4
Connecting to 10.0.0.
19 matches
Mail list logo
